" It feels wonderful, on all critics, on behalf of the it is not often that we are rewarded.
– it has The commitment, personal voice, some kind of objectivity and when it comes to criticism, transparency – to try to accept what is there and not look for something else. The Film is a känslomedium and when it comes it it's very important to let themselves be emotionally affected – for it is the intention of the film – and then think. Take in, think, write.
" I think it often comes down to a handicap that makes you difficult to think in the box. It is not so that I know the correct answer and then screws to it, but when I try to explain something quite simple so there will be something else on the way.
" It has very much to do with it, just the receipt. That one is very faithful to what it is that has entered the deepest – a small detail, a voice, or a story – and always start to unravel where and work from there.
" He was always very upset if you did not and saw something that he thought was very important – and very concerned about my work habits (laughter) – I did not go home but were often left on Expressen's editorial team when the others came in the morning. He was also a very funny and eccentric person who was not like any other. He did a very bohemian impression, he concluded, for example, always their phone call with ”puss” at all. It was nothing you did at the time.