Criticism of Nahles : A Chairman fights itself

you challenge it. Andrea Nahles provoked with their behaviour, contradiction and resistance. In the management bodies of the SPD, those of party and faction, to say it, some Enjoyed already half-resigned. And even more well-intentioned social Democrats find that Nahles was always a Spur "to": too loud, too sharp, too aggressive.

"On the face", her saying about a year ago, the coalition partner, the Union, is clearly no slip-up. Nahles is almost always in combat mode. This applies to the political opponents outside of the SPD, but now also within. The latest example is Florian's Post, the Bavarian member of the Federal Parliament with, admittedly, a private head, of the concerned from time to time against the group line. So in the paragraphs 219a.

May feel none of the term from the squad recalls

the Post use them only as "Abortion", said Nahles. What a word, alone. How can you connect? Now Post should lose his Post in the economic Committee. Because the SPD arithmetic loses a place there, it fits. That does not fit the Bavarian Comrades, was expectable. But other's with the hold Still more difficult. The Gemurre about authoritarian style, suspicion, and friend–or-foe–Think of the party– and faction boss will be audible and open to the public.

More about

dispute in the SPD Nahles' leadership style device in the criticism

Hans Month

you're not for you, are you against them? No, contrary to it echoes of the Chairman, one is not allowed to be of a different opinion. Leadership with open or veiled Order not to come anyway. Caution: do Not now have a feeling of the term from the squad, the sooner the high-trust leaders for the party. It is the number of those by themselves, would have rather increased, when Nahles would lose their Posts, preferably both. She's challenging it.

daily mirror tomorrow location

Overview of the editor Stephan-Andreas Casdorff on the issues of the day from politics and Economics

for your Free copy