Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Brexit-Chaos : Europe, remain steadfast

The parties in the London Parliament are more preoccupied with themselves instead of constructive solutions, such as the desired withdrawal from the EU, with as

- 16 reads.

Brexit-Chaos : Europe, remain steadfast

The parties in the London Parliament are more preoccupied with themselves instead of constructive solutions, such as the desired withdrawal from the EU, with as little damage as possible. You force the other Europeans one more loop to wait, marriage in two weeks - hopefully - the insight that the Brexit Treaty will not be changed. The EU must not succumb to the so-called "Backstop". Because this is not a "repair", as London claimed, but a deterioration for Europe and for the peace process in Ireland.

The Tories are celebrating a rare Moment of cohesion

The contradictory vote maneuver in Westminster had mainly the objective to demonstrate the cohesion of the conservative party. An Apparent Cohesion. In truth, the Tories are divided and have to fear that the dispute over the Brexit summons your end up. As they exit, neither in the present Treaty with the EU still a "No Deal"-with all the ensuing Chaos to some, remains as the lowest common denominator, to send Theresa May renegotiations to Brussels.

you wouldn't treat yourself to this rare feeling, to know together, where you want to go together, Yes, if it was to the detriment of the rest of the Europeans. Just: Why should the EU? Your task is not to save the Tories, but to represent the interests of their members.

The "Backstop" is certainly hard for the British. You must remain in the customs Union until a viable solution is found, such as the Brexit agree with the promise of no new "hard border" between the EU member Ireland and the British province of Northern Ireland. This date will exercise a salutary pressure on London to find a settlement. Because only then will you gain the freedom to conclude their own trade agreements.

daily mirror tomorrow location for Free order

Who has the pressure pontenzial and uses it responsible?

In London, discussed the clause, however, as the EU had potential, then an invalid to Blackmail. It was not unreasonable for the English. You want to have a time limit - a few years. It was in the English interest to come quickly to a contract, so that London can get out of the customs Union.

However, with the time limit, the pressure conditions change. The Englishman could sit out the period, and the los would then be the obligation, even if they would not agree to the Ireland solution. The limited sovereignty with a view to new trading contracts at this time would certainly pain. But enough of this pain in order to force a rapid solution?

if you look at the experience with the Brexit talks, not coming to the realization that The EU was to speedy negotiations. It is hooked up with the British. Where should the Confidence come that London negotiated with the Details of the Ireland-questions quickly and in a constructive way?

The EU must remain steadfast and the British suspect that it remains at "no". To find first, so the pressure continues, a solution, endangering the Irish peace process. Secondly, because the party in government in London has, with its claim to "repair" only their party interests in view. Thirdly, because the Tories run after a Illusion. Even if the EU wanted to - how big are the chances for a Treaty change? The would have to agree to all EU members, even the Irish. And why the do the should - if you exclude the Option that the EU exerts extortionate pressure on your member of Ireland, to rescue the English change their Brexit-illusions?

According to May, a "No Deal is imminent". This is "Bullshit"

Certainly, Theresa May will threaten the "repair" is the only safe way to save the Contract, and for all of the pages are harmful to the "No Deal"-exit on 29. To prevent the March. To do this, one can only say: "Bullshit!" - Now, perhaps the EU negotiators to find a politer phrase. But the better way, "to avoid No Deal", is a decision of the London Parliament, the hard exit at the end of March, to exclude.

The deputies were on Tuesday close to it. The "Cooper's Amendment" would have had this content. It was in a mild - legally non-binding - Form decided. Parallel to this, the majority for renegotiations with the EU, agreed. This is a contradiction. He shows the conflict situation. He also draws attention to the direction in which the debate has moved very, very slowly to the realization that a better contract is not as of the present, interrupted by relapses in illusions.

More about

After a vote in the house of Commons Theresa May is playing at the Brexit on time

Albrecht Meier

in mid-February to May, will meet again before the Parliament, hopefully with empty hands. In the case of, say insiders in London, I May promise to accept a new "Amendments" - which suggest that these insiders as a revival of the "Cooper Amendments". It aims to "No Deal"-Brexit, to exclude and to force a renewal of negotiations. On many detours, the Parliament comes at the end of probably still the goal.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.