Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Krimi texttospeech mercados economía Newsteam

You had a choice – and killed the dogs

"You had a choice – and killed the dogs" "Debater: To say that animal testing is necessary is not ethically sustainable." "This is an opinion piece. It

- 11 reads.

You had a choice – and killed the dogs
"You had a choice – and killed the dogs"

"Debater: To say that animal testing is necessary is not ethically sustainable."

"This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against."

"the DEBATE. Now we have the answer we have feared – the Gothenburg university have killed the six labradors, we have been fighting to save the life of. "

"the Feelings are many and strong: sadness, despair, hopelessness, powerlessness, anger, frustration – and rightly so. For what we're talking about are thinking, sentient individuals – who, just like you and I have the ability to feel such pain and fear – as unethical and indefensible are used and killed in the name of science. "

"It was in the middle of January in the year that Djurrättsalliansen revealed hundförsöket at the university of Gothenburg and launched the campaign to save the dogs. "

"Despite the fact that during several weeks of time have been trying to get to a meeting with Göteborg university, about the dogs' future, so the university has put the lid on. We have invited the university to a public debate on this attempt from a scientific perspective, but the university has declined. "

"Despite a huge public opinion has been brought all over the world in order to save the dogs, despite the fact that the alternatives to this procedure has been presented, despite the fact that several scientific experts have come out and criticised the attempt chose Gothenburg to kill the dogs. "

"Regardless of the arguments, which could come from Gothenburg, so the fact remains that they finally stood with a choice in their hands: they could let the dogs live, but they chose to kill them. "

"whether this is a legal and authorized attempt. Whether this is an ongoing effort where the aim is to study the parts of animals ' bodies after they have been killed. Regardless of whether the university unethical claims that animal testing is necessary. "

"no matter if it is about money or prestige or whatever it may be so, there is not a single argument that makes it acceptable to kill dogs. "

"Gothenburg university should have listened to public opinion and allowed us in Djurrättsalliansen resettle and rehabilitate the dogs in loving homes. The university had an opportunity to take a step towards a more ethical world, but they chose a different path. "

"It is unforgivable. It is indefensible. But this is not in any way over. Now, we shall ensure that no dogs ever again be exploited and killed in this attempt. We will continue to work to ensure that no animals should be seen as försöksobjekt."

"It is, unfortunately, legally with animal experimentation in Sweden. Huge amounts of animals are used and killed in animal experiments each year. We the people takes us unethical and indefensible right to exploit other animals in the name of science. "

"We believe that all animals, regardless of species, people, dogs, fish, rats, rabbits, cats, guinea pigs and so on, should have the right to their own lives. It must therefore to a change in the law that no animals are seen as försöksobjekt and there must be huge bets on non-methods. "

"Precisely for the same reason we don't expose people for experiments against their will, should we not do it with some animals. It is unethical. "

"To say that animal testing is necessary is not ethically sustainable arguments. Most of us are probably positive to research and progress, but most people would also agree that it is research that should not be done. "

"for example, We have set limits on what we expose people to, no matter what knowledge we would be able to get out of it. Then it is on humans the results will be used, there would, of course, yielded much better results to do research on people, even if it was against their will. But we are not doing that simply because it is unethical. With all the right. "

"And the same mean I should apply all the thinking and sentient beings, regardless of species."

"nMalin Gustafsson, spokesperson for Djurrättsalliansen"

"n Join in the debate and comment on the artikelnn – like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook."

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.