The welfare system is failing nattarbetarna

"Several municipalities close nattis"

"Aftonbladet's leader board is the independent social democrat."

"the More services offered outside normal office hours, and nine to five jobs is decreasing. A growing and aging population naturally more jobs within the welfare system. Where has work at uncomfortable time always been a part of the job. In areas such as elderly care personnel must be on hand around the clock.nOckså in the private sector, the trend is such that the range and times of services becomes more flexible. You can order food at anytime of the day and food stores ' opening hours are extended longer and longer into the night. As citizens, it is difficult not to like the increased freedom of choice. As a worker, however, it is not just a development to think about. "

"A third work shift"

"About 31 per cent are working in the day shift, according to statistics SWEDEN. When so many work outside of traditional working hours must society welfare services to follow. One such service that is not up to the mark is childcare at inconvenient hours, a must for skiftarbetaren with children. There is no law that a municipality must offer ”nattis”. Only 70 per cent of the country's municipalities say they have it, according to a survey, the schools inspectorate carried out 2017. But even where there are nattis are the locations normally have and information about the button which makes the actual possibilities to have their children on the nattis are very limited."

"Nattisplatserna reduces"

"It does not get better. On 1 march ended Botkyrka municipality to provide childcare at night. The arguments to put down nattiset are, as always, austerity requirements and general reluctance to raise taxes. Several other municipalities in the country has recently taken a similar decision. It is embarrassing that the municipalities do not manage to offer child care, when citizens actually work. That the development is now going in the wrong hole will make life harder to live for a growing group of shift workers. Paradoxically, working many of them in the same level of welfare, which now fail them."