It is a scientific revolution in the university?

said that we should avoid dialogue with the sub-standard reasoning. It is important to choose an opponent who is good enough, otherwise, to be infected by the stupidity, as well as to the downturn – the prints are always out of what you are writing about. The bad thoughts to flow away into the silence.

the Capacity of the Arpis. and Anna-Karin Wyndhamns , the eagerly awaited granskningsbok ”Genusdoktrinen” it is very doubtful that the polemisera, but I have a suspicion that the reader would be well advised to take a mustaschtyskens advice, and at the very least start off in the välviljans end of the world. I believe that this book will be dismissed by many who ought to be thinking about Arpis and Wyndhamns criticism points to something important – and, of hugging the broke people that had the dimensions of the well-to-read, the more suspicious.

the Background to this is, of course, Arpis controversial series of articles in the Swedish daily newspaper svenska Dagbladet about the gender studies place at university, starting in the late autumn of 2017 on the other (for Travel 4/11-2017). In the past I have been critical of the (25/7-2019), in particular, on the basis of the Arpis of the dramatic rhetoric, all the talk about the genusideologiska överkyrkor, and the quiet revolution.

a metaphor is a thank – you – bortrensad now, when he has crowdsourcat free from the wage system, have in the education programme helping and have written a fairly comprehensive book on the subject. But the idea is pretty much the same.

It sounds a little bit like an intellectual detective story, isn't it?

in other words: gender studies, the influence of the English universities is at risk. In particular, since it is a small discipline, has been given additional administrative powers, sanctioned as a policy area. Gender mainstreaming is known as the. Is very short it implies that the universities have a duty to make its activities more gender-equal. From the inventory lists, and appointments to the research involved.

Responsible for the enforcement of and support for the process was the first of the National secretariat for gender research (in which the Wyndhamn, has worked, and offers insights into the of, then the Jämställdhetsmyndigheten. The authors perceive these organizations as the Feminist initiative ”school event”, rather than a neutral government. From here you operate genusagenter” instead of intersectionality and gender theory, and the ”postmodern” up to date generation to another, to the fields of science, and then byråkratisera into the leader in the load-bearing frames. And in this way the subvertera of liberal humanism, which formed the basis for the science of a couple of hundred years of age.

All of our women's movement the government of god, the eyes.

It sounds a little bit like an intellectual detective story, isn't it?
The american philosopher Judith Butler.Photo by: < / b> TIM BJÖRKDAHL / DN
But it sounds different when you read the book. Arpi, and Wyndhamn's working fairly systematically, with the beginning of the Hesslow store, it, Uppsala university the painful story of a lecturer at the university " Inga-Lill Andersson , Erik Ringmar. , the political scientist, who was forced to quote the Judith Butler in a reference list, which is queerteoretikern itself was found to be unreasonable, wrong, even, how, good, simple intentions behind the pressure was.