For a couple of years ago, I suggested that all Sverigedemokrater would be sent to Thailand. I figured out that it only costs just over seven billion to buy single tickets to all who sympathize with the party. It is a cheap price in order to avoid their opinions. Many were upset, and I realize now that it is wrong to deport 20% of the Swedish population. The 2.046.037 the flight tickets would make a too large carbon footprint.
The sweden democrats care not, admittedly, if that sort of thing. Many in the party think that Sweden should pull out of the paris agreement, whose purpose is to reduce greenhouse gases, and argue, contrary to all available research it does not necessarily is mankind which is causing global warming. For a couple of years ago, the SD's miljöpolitiske spokesman said that SMHI should get less funding because the institute engages in ”bias advocacy”.
fly in 2019 heard högermän and told me that I should not boycott without the support of the airlines so that they may afford to develop environmentally-friendly technology (as if they would make it optional). The other wrote to my flygpaus made me into a so-called sojapojke, a politically correct wimp who engage in godhetssignalering. But if I examine myself, it is not a desire to be good which makes me think of the climate, nor a love for nature. On the contrary, I powered of a politically incorrect fear of immigration.
According to the UN refugee agency (UNHCR are fleeing in average, 21.5 million people due to weather-related disasters each year. The figure of learn are multiplied when it is no longer possible to stay in the Middle east and Africa. Given the relatively limited flyktingvågen 2015 caused severe political turbulence, we can probably assume that the largest wave in the history of mankind will lead to severe problems.
We need to make climate change also attractive to racists.
far-right extremists, dismisses the threat to the climate, at the same time as they are worried about islamization and immigration, is paradoxical. Maybe it's because many parties now want to limit immigration. SD no longer has a patent on the opinion and must find new ways to fight against the so-called establishment. In förfjol wrote sociologist Daniel Lindvall in the DN that the right-wing populist kärnväljare not want to admit that they are dependent on nature: ”For the western man it can be a scary realization because he is the face of the forces of nature, must recognize themselves as equal with all other living things on the planet; including the woman and the dark-skinned stranger.”
not afford to have Sweden's second largest party outside the management of climate change. We must make it attractive even for the racists. If the SD is committed wholeheartedly to reduce the use of fossil fuels, the government tentatively set aside 25 per cent of the budget for culture to the works that pay tribute to sweden's great power period. And if SD acknowledges climate science so we should – in order to give them a carrot – acknowledge that gender studies is bias advocacy.
If that doesn't work, we should ask SD how they believe that their descendants will feel in the 2100-century Sweden, after the Swexit incorporated in the United arab emirates. ”Granny, why do we have sharia law?” wonder the grandchildren. ”Ah,” replies granny. ”My parents said that global warming was a kulturmarxistiskt fabrications, and continued to go charter to Thailand. Then it became very hot. Then moved all in the Middle east here. And now is the time to ask. Allahu akbar!”
Read more texts by Fredrik Strage, for example, that there is a possibility that Perturbator-the fans-selling the blender.