Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Newsteam Karriere Bundesliga Ukraine Bestechung

Children are children – even where land is expensive

"Children are children – even where land is expensive" "Slutreplik in the debate on the lack of fitness facilities for children and young people" "This

- 16 reads.

Children are children – even where land is expensive
"Children are children – even where land is expensive"

"Slutreplik in the debate on the lack of fitness facilities for children and young people"

"This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against."

"SLUTREPLIK. It starts fine in the reply from the politicians. Stressing that all Nackabor – in particular children and young people – should have good access to sport and recreation. To take people's concerns for that sport to be built away seriously. "

"Then it becomes remarkably empty of content. The core question – how will the children be able to play sports in their local neighbourhood in fast-growing areas, as a news site – is concerned barely. "

"We still wonder: Is it okay to 12-year-olds train at 21: 00 on vardagkvällar, parts a 7-spelarplan with 50 others and be forced to travel miles for training? That you become dependent on parents and car?"

"In the reply, spoken to sell attractive land, then you get the money for sports facilities. Implicit, sports facilities, put on non attractive land. What happens in the areas where all the land is sought after? "

"children are Children, even in areas where land is expensive. Research clearly shows that proximity is extremely important for how much children – and adults – moving. And distance exclude. Proximity is especially important for those groups that are not naturally gravitates to the sport. Those who need it most. Furthermore, plant life and movement, and thus the security in the area."

"You can't have your cake and eat it. If you sell the land, you sell also the proximity principle. Of course, you can choose to do. But then you have to take responsibility for the consequence. Less movement, less security and more inequality. And it also applies if you use the money for a nice facility elsewhere. "

"For too many children is a facility beyond the immediate area mockingly out of reach."

"Sure, land is expensive and housing is needed. But the choices Nacka making costs also. Expensive. And the highest price to pay the children. Children who do not have the luxury to choose their parents or their community. "

"They depend on adults to make decisions with their best interest in the first room. 1 January 2020 will be the crc team. Thinking Nacka live up to it?"

"nUlrica von Thiele Schwarz, professor of psychology, researcher at KI, F07-tränarenCarl Johan Sundberg, doctor, professor of exercise physiology at the karolinska institutet, and member of the International Olympic Committee's medical and scientific expertgruppnMagnus Lindwall, professor of psychology, visiting professor in sport science at GIH nMattias von Malmborg, initiator of Save the Nacka IPs"

"n Join in the debate and comment on the artikelnn – like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook."

"the Article is a slutreplik. Read the full the debate here:"

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.