As you know, working the authorities to restrict the danes ' use of cash, thus you can avoid money laundering, undeclared work and simultaneously monitor all transactions down to the smallest detail.
But it is not everyone who has confidence in the financial sector, including, on the banks cracker because of a little risk-averse bonuslønnede bank managers.
a Danish man has over the last 20 years continuously raised 1.5-2 million banked dollars in cash from his account in Nordea.
He has receipts for the withdrawals.
Last summer, he would buy a house, so he wanted he to insert 200,000 in cash dollars on his Nordea-account for disbursement to the property.
But the deal went in the sink for now refused Nordea to receive the cash with regard to the new hvidvaskregler.
the Bank was 'not betrygget in his explanations on the origin', for no one had noted the serial numbers on the banknotes, as he raised them, so it could not be controlled, whether it was the same money, he would insert in the bank.
Then he complained to The financial appeals committee.
'the Bank has no basis for not to feel betrygget in, where the money comes from. It is the bank itself, which has paid the money to him. There is talk about money, as he himself has raised, invested, etc. and saved up. The bank's refusal was unjustified and implies that the money is invalidated and not worth anything,' he wrote.
He stated that the 'Hvidvaskreglerne is not relevant to the case. He does not have anything to whitewash the of the'.
He claimed that Nordea both should receive the 200,000 dkk. plus his remaining 700.000 kr. in cash, if he wants it.
But it refused Nordea, and Nordea had the right of appeal, which virtually always gives the institutions is well founded.
'the Board of appeal finds that as a starting point, must be up to the banks themselves to decide what requirements the of as to the compliance of the rules of money laundering act,' writes the board.
the Man could also forget about getting compensation from Nordea for the wrecked real estate.