Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

The court of Lleida conviction for abuse, and not for assaulting two men who raped a young

The court of Lleida has been sentenced to four years and six months imprisonment to two men who raped her in August last year a young woman in Vielha (Lleida).

- 31 reads.

The court of Lleida conviction for abuse, and not for assaulting two men who raped a young

The court of Lleida has been sentenced to four years and six months imprisonment to two men who raped her in August last year a young woman in Vielha (Lleida). The court considered that there was no sexual assault, as requested by the prosecution, which had sought 15 years in prison, because despite the fact that she refused, and asked the attackers to stop, not shouted or resisted.

MORE INFORMATION to Capture a recording of the five accused of assaulting in July 2016 to a young girl in Pamplona, spain. ATLAS The Herd is freed of rape

The Audience gives total veracity to the story of the victim and considers it proven that the girl ended up being raped in the back of a nightclub, by two men of 23 and 19 years of age, uncle and nephew. The young woman knew one of them. Piabet

After encounter several others in a bar, followed up with them on the night, they went to a night club, continued drinking, and the young man went to the back with one of them. There the young man kissed her, according to the judgment, she “surrounded herself with the legs” and he took it to a party a little more removed and “put her against the wall.” Then he lowered his pants and underwear and penetrated “despite the fact that the young man said repeatedly and crying that not”. After he came to the place, the nephew of the young man, who also raped her and forced her to make him a fellatio.

later, one of them offered to carry it home and ended up accompanying a bridge in front of the hospital, where the young girl was crying until she went to the health centre and explained what happened. “The victim was found without resources to react in another way, being practically paralyzed, without yelling, or to resist, beyond, yes, of manifesting their refusal to what was to be the subject, which made it unnecessary, repeatedly, the use of violence or intimidation to break his will,” concludes the court.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.