READ more - “children learn selflessness from fairy tales. But only from those with human beings”
The study: give or get? The researchers analyzed the choices and perception of well-being and joy of a group of 591 people faced the choice of whether to “give” or “to have”, in economic terms. In particular, the volunteers were asked to decide whether to participate in a prize game in which they would have won 350 euro to donate to charity to save lives or to play a lottery with a prize of a lower figure, equal to € 100, to keep for himself. Subsequently, the authors measured, by means of questionnaires standard, the level of happiness of the participants in two different moments: immediately after you learn if they have won or lost, and at the distance of a month from the outcome.
Generous, happy but sad, after The survey showed that 6 out of 10 people have initially chosen, in the case of winning, to give the money to those who need it: hence, instinctively, we are on average more likely to promote the next. The result reveals that in the short term, immediately after learning the result of the lottery, those who chose to allocate the money to a charity is much happier, while those who held for him the 100 euros, despite the victory, it is more sad. But ricontattando the volunteers after one month, the result of the search is reversed: those who chose the lottery of charity and won, thus giving the figure to save lives, is much less happy. While all those who have obtained a payment to himself - even those who have won money for himself despite having expressed an initial intention to give it away – have said they have a high level of happiness.
The generosity always makes you happy? Numerous previous research had linked behaviors, altruistic and happiness and increase the joy in your life, you also have to be more unselfish, and to adopt behaviors intended to help others, even economically. But it is not always and for everyone as well, and this new study would be the test. Our results, the authors write in the conclusions of the paper, suggest that people may counterbalance the short-term benefits obtained from a behavior prosociale with costs delayed.
READ - “you Want to be happy? Be more unselfish,”
How to interpret the result, But this does not mean that one who derives joy from a personal gain to be less altruistic, or that, necessarily, the generosity will lead us to long to less satisfaction. The study depicted a particular situation, studying the relationship between happiness and reward for the economy, and in happiness, in the short and long term, is regulated by a number of different elements, which change over time. At the beginning dominates the idea of “giving”, that in and of itself, give a pleasure, a reward, even if not monetary, as well as a positive self image. A month later, however, the good action tends probably to be less central in our thoughts, and derive less satisfaction, while, if we have earned money and, above all, if we're still spending$, this satisfies the most.
A reason for this, so it might be useful to do this to ourselves the ability to donate money or help others with other gestures (not necessarily economic), even when the action is now far. Because of the generosity – and happiness – you can also train.
"The Republic will fight always in defense of the freedom of information, to its readers and to all those who have at heart the principles of democracy and civil coexistence"Carlo Verdelli SUBSCRIBERS TO REPUBLIC © Reproduction reserved Today on the Count: “our sacrifices for the good of all. We follow the rules, and Italy will raise up” The fear of fear Coronavirus, the duel with the Regions and the leak. But the government does not exclude other restrictions on The Country's Upside-down of the coronavirus family is divided between North and South: “there is No lightness”