Stuttgart the Senate sees it as proven that the defendant is behind numerous negative entries about a colleague. The basis for the judgment: a voice report.
A dentist from the vicinity of Stuttgart has a court judgment, a competitor with false reviews on the Internet poorly made. In the dispute between two dentists the higher regional court of Stuttgart issued on Wednesday a temporary injunction against the defendant, prohibiting such activities on the Internet in the future.
in order for a judgment of the district court of Stuttgart was cancelled. Unlike the district court, the Senate saw it as proven that the defendant is behind numerous negative entries on review sites. On the basis of a language report: Thus, the bad reviews about the practice of the plaintiff, as well as laudatory Statements about the practice of the defendant were "very high probability" by the same author.
Of the individual points, which are listed in the language report, though none, taken by itself, said the presiding judge. "But if you take everything together, it is sufficient." The Language assessments had identified in the texts recurring spelling errors. In addition, the term "atmosphere" and the topic of cost came up in the reviews. The defendant acknowledged the application for an injunction. He stressed at the end but again, to be the author of the text.