minus the Liberal Alliance, are gone to fight for a ban on muslims in Denmark can call for prayer. They dare not, however, really stand by, that it is only islam's religious noise, they will hit, since we have freedom of religion in Denmark - at least on paper.
civil Thursday up with a resolution on the ’prohibition of højttalerforstærket bønnekald and similar religious speech in the public space.’
the majority of, but when I take it up, is it because the proposal is excellent, if it is not equal to the maximum discriminatory ulterior motive.
all the religious noise in the public space? Why get Church law to bimle and bamle every Sunday morning? Just because it does not take place through a speaker but with a church bell. It is at least as loud and annoying.
for example, noisy wind turbines in our neighborhood, when we accept the church bells? Quite a few use the church, while we all need power.
and know that kirkeklokkernes bimlen is a part of our cultural heritage. But why do we accept it in a modern time? We also stopped to accept slavery, and that men have more right than women.
højttalerforstærkede bønnekald, is essentially the marketing of an event. Should AGF then also be allowed to disrupt the søndagsfreden in Aarhus with a bell or højttalervogn every time they play at home?
the core of it all, it's all about an attempt to maintain a time, not more. A time, where the pale, the christian danes were the only thing our small cosy little corner was filled with. And where the christian church filled something for all of us. Such is not the case anymore. The past is the past.
for all the religious hubbub.