Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Video: cannot tell the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship of the

When the Leaves are claiming that ”I have never understood that the VPK was not standing up for democracy,” is an expression of a remarkable historical blindnes

- 943 reads.

Video: cannot tell the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship of the

When the Leaves are claiming that ”I have never understood that the VPK was not standing up for democracy,” is an expression of a remarkable historical blindness. The whole thing is a very serious matter, for it is as Stefan Löfven said that he did not know how a democracy boundaries need to be drawn.

Over the decades it took the Party receiving financial support and to the directives of the Soviet union and the communist international. The pronounced admiration and idyllisering of the revolution and of the dictatorship, characterized all the time, from world war ii up to the dictatorships addresses in the northeast.

< Hyllningstalet to his
In the course of the cold war, which was rock solid in the Soviet union. It was the most evident expression of the C-H Hermanssons infamous speech at Stalin's funeral in 1953.

the ”Stalin was a great historical personality and the depths of the knowledge of nature and society, utvecklingslagar. He had put all his work in the growing, the progressive, the irresistible, the victorious forces of the universe's service.

CH, However, the leader of the Swedish Left party communists, 1964-1975. Photo by: < / b> SVEN LINDWALL

describing the VPK with a modern, Europe, mass murderers and despots. Tributes heard, indeed, not only does the 1950's to the. On October 7, 1989, submitted to then-VPK-president, Lars Werner, along with the rest of the worker's party comradely greetings and congratulations of the GDR's 40th anniversary, out just a few days before the fall of the berlin wall. Wherever, it was a socialist dictatorship of the highly acclaimed one and admired it.

Misery was apparent to all of the other
as recently as the party in 1987, writing in the about section of the socialist countries, and the economy, and how successful they were, in a world in which the planekonomiernas collapse, it was clear to everyone else:.

for the economy and for the economy to exhibit the grandeur of the result, when it comes to travel the country out of underdevelopment and poverty, and to re-create them for the developed welfare states. The government of the socialist social transformation, has released the popular forces, and are thus unable to achieve a sustainable economic, social and cultural development.

Sweden may not have a prime minister who cannot see the difference between the collaborators, and the democracy of friends.

and Those living in the poverty rate did not share the same view, but they were forced, by the oppression to live in it. In the section dealing with the government of the socialist countries, and that, therefore, the recurrence of the acclaimed and one of the oppression days, was as follows:

the government of the Socialist revolution has, to date, in particular, have taken place in the industrially backward countries with democratic traditions, and is a regular migrant working class, or, so, they have been struck by a pattern from any of the countries. Still, there are severe restrictions on the freedom of association, right to freedom of expression and freedom of speech.”
Video: you have to explain to their democracy
This is a description of a dictatorship is ridiculous, given that there is no freedom in these countries. And the revolution, wrote the following about how to respond to the opposition.

”with the attempt by the härskarklassen, or a foreign power interests, to destroy samhällsomvälvningen by the attack on democracy, it is the leaders of the revolution, the task is to uphold and defend it.”

, Stefan Löfven, has a lot to explain, and not just in the sight of the Party, but also of his own views on democracy. Sweden may not have a prime minister who cannot see the difference between the collaborators, and the democracy of friends.

Gunnar Hökmark, is a former Mep, (c), and the chairman of the Frivärld. He started Måndagsrörelsen to the aid of baltic citizens, after the social-democratic representatives have condemned the wounds of the balternas of freedom.

MORE information: , the Party is still fighting for communism, the MORE: Sjöstedt dream village ends up as for MORE information, see , that You are giving control to the game, which was the money of the SovjetAndra also lästSandra deeply in debt forced to move to his ex -

, a 27-year-old debt on 875 000: ”Extreme emergency”.

Sjöberg's announcement of a serious illness
Friidrottsikonen sedated for two weeks: ”I can do probably not like this turn”
Michael Persbrandts luxury motorhome has a garage
”Needs to have a place to stay” a New question about the Tiger Woods in a crash
the Police will take it back to the statement about alcohol ✓ free Courses did not slow down.

Eerie, the technology behind the hämndporr-the app
mini documentary about the Deepfake • the Experts 'concern,' it is only a matter of time.

Kändiskvinna judged on crazy in Östermalm, sweden
who is Sentenced to sit in the negative, for the reckless driving • ”Got scared” Next
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.