Racing Genk yesterday was a glimpse of the frivolous footballing team of the last months. The authoritarian competieleider went 3-1 in the boat at Jan Breydel. Where it went wrong in the Limburgers? “At the veldbezetting,” says Geraerts. “Clement made a separate choice. In retrospect it is of course easy to talk about, but it seemed to me to be not the right choice.” Marc Degryse agrees: “They did themselves a bit of the tie with the veldbezetting. And then there was Ingvartsen –barely played - that the furniture had to rescue. You can that boy not much blame. To someone that few minutes has made the hardest move of the season... You should already have going for her, wants you to participate. It picked up are not very good. The team was lost from minute one.”
Genk began not in his usual 4-3-3, but in 3-5-2 formation. Keygnaert: “The Genk-watchers told Clement that formation once on stage, in the oefenmatch against Schalke. When it ran it well. He has an internship working on other systems, because he suspected that opponents were set on their system. There was so trained. But the Club did well: Wesley went to Aidoo and Dewaest was suddenly the man in possession who is not a aanspeelpunt found.”
“It's also a bit against the nature of the team”, it picks up Degryse. “You have 25 matches in a different way played then ask that players behind stamp the ball, but to Ingvartsen and Samatta’. There is not much logic in. But it can also happen that the trainer made a mistake.”