Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

To battle in the court of law may be required to move to the countryside?

< strong rural areas needed to live, to stay and help with the work, and the tax-paying ability of the county to all parts of the. In particular, it is of great

- 135 reads.

To battle in the court of law may be required to move to the countryside?

< strong rural areas needed to live, to stay and help with the work, and the tax-paying ability of the county to all parts of the. In particular, it is of great importance for small towns and municipalities in which each of the additional residents who are working are making a big impact.

it makes me sad that a strict, narrow interpretation of red tape is allowed to stand in the way of positive change in our communities.

A young, working couple, Sandra and Jack had a desire to buy a small farm in the countryside, a few animals, and begin to build a family. In a time of rapid urbanisation and the depopulation of the villages is a real problem for many counties, it would seem logical to encourage this desire.

Unfortunately, it is not so, it has become the practice.
Got the green light,
the Couple agreed to a sales representative about buying a house, the maintenance building and some acres of farmland and forest land outside of Robertsfors in a subdivision of a larger property. This deal is good for both parties, where the seller has inherited, and is primarily interested in maintaining the forest at the same time as the Sandra and Jack would be interested in a small farm, and the opportunity to be with animals.

It could also be argued that it is in the public interest, that the physical buildings did not stand, and will be yet another in the line of a derelict house in a rural area.

the national land survey of sweden gave the green light to avstyckningen. The dream of a life in the country was on the eve of being realized at the same time, as it was about to get a new, able-bodied and the healthy forces of the state.

Would the county administrative board in the interpretation been established, it is very, very negative impact on the attractiveness of the

Unfortunately, the provincial government is a very different interpretation, and I jumped out and contested thing, which means that the young couple must take the matter to the land and environment court. In the appeal, refers the county to the real property law of the third chapter, the fifth, and the sixth section.

In the fifth paragraph, it is clear, among other things, that the separate account shall be (not should, but must) be given to the employment and settlement of rural areas should be promoted.

Not set yet
If The interpretation is correct or not, the land and environment court has not yet taken a position on, but there is no shortage of opportunities to be more generous when it comes to moving to a rural area.

There is a possibility that, I believe, to the county board in a landsbygdslän should use in a situation where the choice is effectively between in-migration and rural development, to leave the old farm buildings are left to fall to ruin. A new, larger agricultural areas, which will require substantial investment, it would be set up on the site, is most likely not seen to the development of the community.

When the King, in his handbook of the real property act interprets the meaning of the experience from the previous cases, the assessment is that ”in rural areas, where the need for regional consideration is very large, it may be appropriate to be a bit less restrictive in terms of the formation of a small real-estate”.

their appeal
This is an interpretation that would not be desirable, and is also the county administrative board in landsbygdslän of the villages, who are struggling with out-migration could be the cause. I hope, therefore, in the first instance to the provincial government to act constructively, to realize that you have made an unnecessarily restrictive interpretation, which is bad for the countryside, and the withdrawing of the appeal. In the other hand, I hope that the land and environment court found that, As a more generous interpretation is correct.

it Would be the county's interpretation been established, it is very detrimental to the attractiveness, and the fire was made on the development of ödegårdar. As the legislation is not in line with the development of society and the modernisation of the country will be able to live with the real thing. < / span> < / span>

An ambassador.

READ MORE: - the Closure of the schools, to the brutal effects of the gusts. READ MORE: the Court's new rulings on the controversial and the Västlänken railway tunnel. READ MORE: , the provincial government, the central Government should consider Our utbyggnadExperten: This is the best of the best drones on the market, the 5 different models at different price points•, So you should think about when you are buying.

Oslo, rödlistat of the Norwegian Folkhälsomyndigheten
the Harsh criticism of the capital, ”is Making a mockery of the whole virusbekämpningen.”

to the Experts: The covid-19 in the winter

Olivia, 24, didn't the surgery – it went down to 25 pounds on it's own

of the Doctors said ' no ' to gastric bypass, As was she.

Avenykrogen would not let in the inspectors Risk the penalty of a fine of 75 000 euro.

The next
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.