and that, In a democracy, citizens need to be able to have trust and confidence in the justice system. This trust can take a long time to build up, but unfortunately, it will quickly be destroyed.
It is now the lapse of a period of time, after the extraordinary press conference in which the chief prosecutor, Krister Petersson, completed the gigantic palme commission, with an areas of responsibility are still.
Expectations were huge on revealing the new bevisuppgifter of guns, and more had been revealed and was to be presented.
Hence, was nothing.
there is No concrete evidence to
During the press conference, pointed out, rather than the prosecution – in the absence of any concrete evidence, the outing of the so-called " Skandiamannen as the privy council of sweden sannolike of a firearm.
such An illegal naming of a public prosecutor and the mandatory objektivitetsplikt is totally at variance with all that the rule of law and decency require of us.
the rule of Law, Sweden is put in the uncomfortable rocking. In addition, openly, in the face of the world's media.
the Fundamental principles of justice must apply in all cases.
palme commission came early to some of the managers are considered to be apart from the rest. The key legal principles were set aside, at least partially, such as, for example, in the operation of the so-called PKK track.
the Similarities with the Kevinfallet
Åklagaransvaret of the palme commission, should have been a guarantee of complete objectivity, from the very beginning, and right up to the very end.
Objektivitetskraven preclude the possibility that the prosecution, in connection with the decision to close to publish his or her own opinion about the identity of the sannolike the killer is.
Palmeåklagaren as well and took the right to do so is hardly surprising, as we've all witnessed the disastrous, illegal and the consequences of that particularly drew the attention of the so-called " Kevinfallet.
There was at the press conference, the two underage boys are frivolous, like that responsible for the death of a child. They are accused of gärningspersonerna, as well as their families, had to live with the consequences of the illegal persecution in the twenty-year period of time.
as a result of new investigation, then come to the conclusion that the independence of the children, were innocent, have a skadeståndsärende have recently come to the fore.
the prosecution have to respect the rule of law and the rule of law
Skandiamannen have no way to now take action against the persecution, since he has been dead since the year 2000. According to the task, the lack of close relatives of the deceased.
no matter who is involved, a criminal investigation is always based on the principles of objectivity and fairness.
the public prosecutor's office shall not, after the decision to close down an investigation, and allow yourself to bring an analytical line of reasoning in the question of guilt, and after a subjective evaluation, establish a debt. This is true even if one identifies with a sannolikhetsreservation.
in A press conference, can never substitute for a judicial review. When the trial is out of the question, the prosecutor anständighetsvis to refrain from any comment on the question of guilt.
the attorney general will have to respond
the Prosecutor-general (RÅ), who has been very quiet on the matter.
According to the indication of preferred Palmeåklagaren the case of the CRUDE, prior to the press conference. Also, it should reasonably be brought to RAW to be aware that a naming sannolike the perpetrator was going to happen. We find it hard to believe that the draftsman would have omitted that important fact.
no matter what happened in the session it is important to know how the country's top prosecutor looks at the persecution of the Skandiamannen.
Even though we are in our lifecycle as a defense attorney, the respective public prosecutor had a different understanding of, for example, of evidence, and we are in this for the rule of law the fundamental question in full agreement.
the prosecution have to respect the rule of law and the rule of law.
Dismissed from the commission of inquiry
the public prosecutor's inappropriate naming of the Olof Palme sannolike the murderers, therefore, should lead to a follow-up to the rule of law.
A fair trial, and assumes that the whole of the pre-trial investigation has been fair and equitable.
as Of the palme commission has, as far as we have discovered, this so – called Skandiamannen, never while he has the life communicated to a reasonable suspicion of to intentionally be deprived of Olof Palme in his life.
During those interviews, he had had every opportunity, with the assistance of a lawyer to protect themselves from the very serious, the suspicion.
For us, it is very much illegal to Palmeåklagaren during a press conference to respond with a one-sided quasi-judicial proceeding, and points out a specific person as the probable assassin of Olof Palme.
There is, in our opinion, far from upholding the rule of law. < / span> < / span>
in the Earlier, the superior prosecutor.
READ MORE: , the Path He pointed out that Olof Palme's murderer, READ MORE: , After the exposure, several notices of libel. READ MORE: , GW: Skandiamannen murdered and no Limits,”Which other team can match such a class?” Gleeförbannelsen Drugs, child pornography, and cyber bullying
Gleeförbannelsen Drugs, child pornography, and cyber bullying