the EUROPEAN commission is promoting its proposal for a so-called " recovery funds for coronakrisen, which is necessary in order to bring the EU out of the crisis, and the rescue of the functioning of the internal market.
in the Rich member states, of which Sweden will contribute to a rapid recovery in the hardest-hit countries. At the same time, argue a Swedish business leaders that we have to help our own exports go to pay for the 150 billion skattekronor to the fund.
Both are wrong.
to Be scared of the EMU ( in The 17-18th of July, there will be a new summit of the EUROPEAN union on the fondförslaget. The government has so far objected to the arrangement, in which up to 500 billion euros, is proposed to be given as grants to the affected states.
The opposition should be the one to hold on to.
THE EUROPEAN commission, sifferrika decision making comes through is a completely different animal than what is described in marketing as well.
this is not a question of solidarity versus the misers, but as a conversion fund, in order to save the euro. It has some stimulating effect, but the more sinister complications."
in Order to determine who should pay and who should benefit from stacking it up the member states into three groups: the Rich and the poor, with high levels of debt and a poor, low-current liabilities.
poor, the group with high levels of debt in the case of Cyprus, germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain), should have the largest contribution in absolute terms.
the Groups have zero connection to the corona.
It is the country with the highest death toll, per capita, and, in addition, a very high level of government debt, B, must, on the contrary, pay into the fund.
in The countries in which it is proposed to get the most as a share of GDP, pro-poor, with low debt, have been hit very lightly by a virus.
in Order to be effective, a konjunkturstimulans be an early stage, preferably already in the nedgångsfasen. Now, the recovery has already begun.
the complexity of The process of the EUROPEAN union, the proposal means it is unlikely to be any significant stimulation can take place until after 2022. As a policy for economic recovery are poor.
The so-called " återhämtningsfonden, unfortunately, is an example of how the EU works, which is the worst,
Resursomfördelningen in the fund to the countries which host 80 per cent of the total exports to the EU is going to pay for the rest. Thus, the drop in our most important markets today.
because they are poor, without a high level of public debt must vote in favour of the bail-out, we propose that they are eligible for support under the fund, as a share of GDP, and even better than that, which goes to the sydeuropéerna.
The members of the group are the EU's most corrupt member states, including Bulgaria and Slovenia.
the Court of auditors, every year, pointed out that part of the aid they receive does not end up in the right pockets. It is now proposed, in spite of it getting a new jättebelopp, all the way up to the 22 per cent of the GDP.
Among the recipients are the countries that openly reject the EU's approach to democratic rights and freedoms of others.the Huge utility
Europe is confronted with major challenges to be faced after the coronapandemin. However, the giant utility, which is on the table, is not only about an economic recovery after the coronakrisen.
at the end of 20 years of the single currency, Italy has lost 20 percent of its purchasing power compared with Germany.
the Italian industry has been difficult to maintain the same currency union, such as French, German, and of the tensions within the european monetary union are growing. Therefore, the need for a transfer union.
the Commission's decision documents do not mention this.
Able to make it to a service
Instead, you mix the issue of line of reasoning to the functioning of the internal market is under threat. It's not that at all.
It is possible to trade on a common market, in spite of the large differences in the level of prosperity. As long as you don't have a common currency.
The so-called " återhämtningsfonden, unfortunately, is an example of how the EU works, which is the worst. Through the ' no ' vote makes Sweden the union of the services. < / span> < / span>
in the Past, the EU's ambassador.
as a freelance Journalist and the former secretary of state.
the Former minister for trade and industry ('S):
READ MORE: in Our export markets on the verge of collapse. READ MORE: , Stefan Löfven at the summit of the union, at loggerheads ahead of the talks. READ MORE: , Sweden should be in favour of EU-support for the coronadrabbadeBiltema the lap of luxury in Europe, making billions of , • a private jet • Luxury apartments • the Grandchild is singled out as the successor.Serievåldtäktsman are being hunted by the secret police release identikit