Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Perspectives: the League's disciplinary of the most amazing adventures continue – now HPK and Arto Laatikainen pay the price
HPK is the most recent League disciplinary line to the relief of the victims, writes the Vesa Parviainen.Arto Laatikainen deservedly received a three game ban is the worst setback in the semi-final series Tappara against preparing for HPK. Tomi Natri / AOP

Everyone in the playoffs to reach the team's goal is to be in the spring of whack. At the same time, refereeing and disciplinary level has dropped like a cow's tail.

.

the League's discipline and player safety last season, in accordance with a five-person disciplinary delegation. It is chaired by Sampo Liusjärvi and the other members are Pekka island tribe, Thomas Pöyhönen, Markku Tuominen and Robert Attorneys.

.

let's Take three examples. All on the head of tackles.

Lynx Sam Vainionpää got a pity pleijarien the last match, hit his three-game ban. Then TPS Lauri willow niemi was released the main video, the judge proposed by the match penalty and I also saw a game ban. In the end HPK:n Arto prepare one for the bash was today three take the cake.

. They happened in the same TPS-HPK-mid-term one arja; wicker cape tackle Teemu Turuseen in the third and Laatikainen tackle willow cape of the fifth match.

. The guy chased a vulnerable moment, when this was just received by the input, and in either case, the back sloping, i.e., so to speak, from behind a tree. As well as willow cape that Laatikainen seek clearly to hurt the opponent and kolhaisivat this shoulder head.

willow cape of the liberalisation of justification in their discipline the five noted that this will execute the tackle, the shoulder above hits largely from Turku to the upper body. According to the decision, the tackle could not be established against the head first or else so strongly, that it should impose a match penalty.

”largely on the torso, not the head first”.

. According to the head on the tackle, as is also considered the kind of tackles, the first of which to the body, against the tackle after tackle against also get.

.

all the Same, stupid and reprehensible act experienced pakilta, and a three-match collar because it suffers now, the whole team. Game ban was completely deserved.

. Vainionpää should shoulder the highlighted down - even so down that bad tackles to receive prepared for the SaiPan Erik Autio's head fell and the helmets hit together.

Still, so a three game ban. When such a microscopic tight and yliherkästä line about the decision after the willow of the peninsula does what they do and get zero matches, it is even more difficult to understand.

.

Completely to another discussion place is in it, whether such a three-match ban in the first place sufficient species rumimmasta works, I get hit on. They don't, at least not enough of them reduced.

Even fewer of them will reduce the random, incredible valkopesut.

.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.