It is a lot of money. To pension capital of the employees during decades saved up and you want to receive after Retirement as pension. Until then, manage an employee Pension Fund savings. These works are organised in different ways. Some of the collection are hard to see through colossi emerged institutions from sometimes Thousands of small Pension funds.
It has remained in the past years, some of the transparency on the track. It is true that the superintendence of the pension funds , now is Alarm and an instruction to draft clear conditions. Because when it comes to the subsistence pension, are not opaque shops acceptable.
Against a targeted approach to the protection of the pension there is little to object to.
The Association of Inter-Board, representing the interests of collective bodies, rejected the proposal in a sharp tone. Essentially, he accuses the superintendence excessive bureaucracy and abuse of authority. The higher administrative expenses could be with the instruction draft, in fact, can not be avoided. But first, the Inter-Board exaggerates with the estimated costs. And secondly, only those collection facilities would be affected, the certain criteria is not meet. The vast majority of the transparent precautionary works would have nothing to fear. Against a targeted approach to the protection of the pension there is little to object to.
The superintendence must, however, be careful that you do not exceed competence. With the instruction design they put together their range of activities, in fact, generous. But she's in a quandary: it does nothing, accused her failures, if there is a Precautionary device in the wrong location. More important than a discussion about abuse of authority and bureaucracy would be that the involved circles to tackle, finally, a solution to the problem. Because that prevention works opaque constructs and questionable developments, is largely undisputed.
Created: 03.02.2019, 22:12 PM