Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Wicker Biden IHeartRadio Music Awards Company Israel


Pension reform : a regime is not truly universal, for the agents of Parliament

The idea of the universal pension plan was to deal with the topic of the inequities existing between different pension schemes. Between public officials and private employees, in particular. From 2025, the public officers and employees in the private sector will, on paper, treated equally, and all those born after 1975 are affected by the reform. Except that... many strokes of the knife have already been given in the contract.

read also : pension Reform: beware of "the effect" CSG

The last week has just brought a new episode in the soap opera. This episode focuses on the civil servants of the national Assembly and the Senate. These agents have a diet very derogatory with levels of remuneration, bonuses and pensions are very high. Up to now, the changes to the plan of the officials of the Parliament were only decisions of the office of the two assemblies.

the initial text of The government aimed to align fully with the officers of the two chambers on the common of the universal plan. This was without counting on the initiative of the rapporteur of the majority in the draft law on pensions, Guillaume Gouffier-Cha, which was adopted on February 28, an amendment no. 37726 in article 6. Even in the context of the use of 49.3, this amendment is well preserved in the act adopted on 3 march to the Assembly.

The reform applied to agents born after 1985 instead of 1975

The text provides as well to postpone the application of the text to the generation of officers born after 1985 instead of 1975 :

"effective January 1, 2025, would also be integrated into the ON all the officials of the national Assembly and the Senate entered before December 31, 2021, as soon as they are born in 1985 or after. The other, born before, will remain affiliated with the funds current. The former staff members who have liquidated their rights before 2025 will remain affiliated to these funds, regardless of their year of birth."

read also : Retirement: "is it really Necessary to get independent to shoehorn in a system that doesn't match?"

as You can see here the parallelism of the forms in relation to the drivers (only drivers) of the RATP and the SNCF, which will also be affected by the reform, but only those who are born after 1985 and not after 1975. The officers of the Assemblies, thus saving them 10 years ago and only a few hundred of them should undergo the reform.

It should also be emphasized that the "surcotisation" agents - which will incorporate the calculation of their premiums - will be taken care of by the national Assembly, and this during thirty years.

An entry in the new system as early as 2022

"All the parliamentary staff who go into the executives after December 31, 2021, shall be transferred to the universal system of retirement (ON) from 1 January 2022 : as to the deputies or senators, and an identical date, the current scheme is closed and there is no more new contributors." The amendment of the majority was adopted to 63 for... and 0 against. 26 abstained, including 10 LR, 2 PS, 2 BIA...

Obviously, the vote in the public voting has been decided that the opponents of this amendment may not vote openly against it, since, when there is public voting, the names of the members voting and their votes shall be made public and published on the website of the national Assembly. Hence the fact that no member has voted against, in order not to antagonize the officers of the Assembly...

read also : Reform of the pension system: this very expensive clause in the Italian style"

This change in the text amendment makes the pension plan of the agents of Parliament even more derogatory compared to the common law than that of the railwaymen. It would seem that everything is done by the officers of Parliament, and that, if ever a new government came in question in 2022, the pension reform, they can go back...

That said, it could have been worse and the staff of the Parliament would have been able to remain entirely outside the universal system and pension system would have been managed in a discreet fashion, by the bureaux of the assemblies.


The Macronomètre, the observatory of reforms of the government, is a website of the Foundation iFRAPen partnership with Le Figaro. It is a tool dedicated to the assessment of the quinquennium of Emmanuel Macron: econometric evaluation in relation to its electoral programme and announcements of his government. With The Macronomètre, the action of the government is to be marked out of 10 each Wednesday prior to the council of ministers and becomes readable in a single glance. The Macronomètre allows each to make a notice on the holding or not of the promises of the president of the Republic and on the effectiveness of the reforms of the government.

The editorial team conseilleGuillaume Tabard: "Municipal, pensions, standing before the act II"Pensions: the lawyers are they "winners", as the ensures Laurent Pietraszewski?SujetsretraitesRéforme of retraitesLe Macronomètre26 commentairessoccadansele 22/04/2020 17:52

WHAT a SILENCE on THE PART OF : MARTINEZ ,the great DEFENDER of the ARTICLES of association PRIVILIEGIES ;;; Because he shall receive a pension but it will be very ,VERY COMFORTABLE .But his biggest regret is not being able to STAY in a council flat ,with his FAMILY and be surrounded by privileged people ????

nrgumenle 09/03/2020 at 09:42 am

What hurts the most it is 0 votes against in the presence of 10 RL. a
A party of the right cardboard voting measures to encourage a group of public servants ... After the same LR come to complain of their loss of weight and credibility within the public sensitivity of the liberal party.

mistophorele 08/03/2020 15:11

A reform egalitarian in words but totally unequal, in fact, as the tax macronites "fair" but totally unfair .

Read the 26 reviews
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.