by Stefan Löfven announced that the arbetslöshetsmål are already in the social Democrats ' party congress in april, 2013. From the stage in Gothenburg, sweden stated that Sweden would have the lowest unemployment rate in the year 2020.
When the Leaves became prime minister the following year, he was able to put the objective into practical policies.
as For the swedes, who went without a job was the prize, however, is high. In order that the hair of the figures was denied for many of them to register with the public employment service. The others were not allowed to apply for a diy. To be in contravention of both national laws, international conventions, and played less of a role.
no, No, stop! So, you could, of course, is never to be. The employment rate target was just a target, it should point to the direction of the government's policy is not to put an absolute cap on the number of unemployed people in Sweden.
After that, the immigration policy, the talks broke down earlier in the summer, the prime minister, the recurrent claims that the Research proposal is contrary to the right to asylum.
"no, No, we've said' no ' to alliance oil targets, that is, we have been very, very clear, therefore, that we will stand up for the right to apply for asylum. To set alliance oil targets, X is the number of people and then another one, then, she said, he did not apply for asylum, " he told the Aftonbladet newspaper in mid-July.
It doesn't matter how many times Conservatives have pointed out that the countries with a high regard to refugees, such as Germany and Canada, already have the same type of case, and that the right of an individual trial still exist. The prime minister continues to repeat that alliance oil targets would be contrary to the international conventions. But, strangely enough, it is not that the social Democrats ' own proposal that Sweden should not accept any more asylum-seekers than the average in the EUROPEAN union.
It has been obvious for a long time that Stefan Löfven commented, is not the Others, or Persson. At times, this has created concern for the prime minister, for example, in the infamous Agenda of the interview on the gängskjutningarna in november of last year.
Löfvens free fabulerande if the volume target makes me long for a real media red again.
However, I'm wondering if the lack of touch in their dealings with the media, sometimes it's talking to the Löfvens advantage. Some reporters seem to the end of the resignera in his monotonous repetition of the talepunkter. It's the ”I love life” as a rhetorical tactic. And it seems to be working. At the end, one will no longer work. It allows the prime minister to go over their falsehood, if the volume target. You can always make a call but the party later on, a disclaimer.
I was never a supporter of the ”faktakollar,” which was popular in the media for a couple of years ago. The self-confidence of the classification of political statements in green, yellow, or red light, was not infrequently gives rise to more questions than answers. In reality, there is often more than three colors.
when the prime minister is spreading pure falsehoods about one of the opposition's proposals turn the immigration policy debate into a quagmire where nothing is true and everything is possible.
It should be the media's job to bring it back to solid ground again.
READ MORE: this is not good enough for a prime minister. READ MORE: : If the C's unbearable lightness of being in the asylum