MP: what if we could all work less

Coronakrisen have put it all in the end. Human life has been extinguished ahead of schedule, the companies have gone out of business, borders has been shut down. Social distance is, however, at the same time, a wide-spread solidarity. We are going to get through this crisis together. And that's not all. We should take advantage of this opportunity to create a better future, one where we will develop the desirable and leave the destructive nature of history. What if we were able to work less and live more?

in the Meantime, divide in today's society and are based on a painfully obvious separation between those who have too much free time, and for those who have a bit of free time. Between the isolation, the long-term unemployed or unfit for work, and the stresses of life to all who juggles full-time work, and livspusslets requirements, we will have to find a balance. Today, the case of a measure which says that it is ”normal” to work a 40-hour-a-week. However, it doesn't have to be that way.

Lower unemployment and a healthier planet
At a time when stress-related illnesses are the leading sjukskrivningsorsaken, and our way of life exceeds the limits of our planet, so is a shorter work week is a good idea. By working less, stressing less, and consuming less, we can create better conditions for social and ecological sustainability. If we reduce the normal working time, more people can share in the jobs, the lower unemployment rate and fewer people on sick leave. Why do some go through while others are forced to stay at home without a job to go to?

today, it is normal to consume the planet's resources is not sustainable to burn out young, and being old school, on the job market at the age of 50 years,

What has happened in the last few decades, as technological prowess has given us an increase in productivity, that is, that the tempo is screwed up, and shareholders picked up all the bigger payouts. There is hardly any, so that people are aware that the increase in productivity has freed up more time for the recovery. On the contrary, the reach of the stress of all skill levels. Just think, if we had been in this produktivitetssprång of short-time work, as, for example, a 4-hour day been put into effect.

Incredibly, effective case,

the MP wants a short normal working time in stages. Back in 1973, there was a reform in which all parties, except the Conservatives, were agreed on, which is a six-hour working day. Shorter working days, freeing up more time and also give huge benefits for the environment. We are reducing the working hours to ten per cent, thus reducing our carbon footprint by twenty percent and our carbon footprint by 15 per cent. It is an incredibly effective environmental measure that is to be achieved at the same time, we will strengthen the cohesion of the community, reduce polarisation in the labour market and reduce the sjukskrivningstalen.

What is the ”normal” working hours is something that we decide together. Today, it is normal to consume the planet's resources is not sustainable to burn out young, and being old school, on the job market at the age of 50 years. The question is whether it is normal is a good thing? And, most importantly, what will it cost us in the long run?
free time is a measure of the welfare of the
in fact, We can choose to change the rule. Working 9 to 5 is a classic song, but it describes no organizational truth carved in stone. The green party wants to create a society that is in balance, which gives priority to the quality of life and the environment, in a few additional % growth per year. The hotel is, without a doubt, it's forgotten välfärdsmåttet. < / span> < / span>

- Policy spokesman, MP.

the cultural policy spokesman, MP.

the tax policy spokesman, MP.

READ MORE: what about the MP that immigration is going to be paid?

READ MORE: : the MP's inefficiency is disastrous for Sweden.

READ MORE: , Who will stop it when the women are stressjuka?The hero of the crash: ”He did not say even a thank you,”