No need any longer to doubt of it, a battle is currently under way on the legislation. Don't even have to coronapandemin are going to be able to change it.
the code presented to the inquiry by the government, and the samarbetspartierna set up in the last year of the labour law, which is part of the Januariöverenskommelsen. The content is of a political explosion.
it is proposed, among other things, that the five persons should be excluded from the turordningsreglerna on the ”last-in, first-out,” and that the unions would no longer have the right to void the layoff of the company, with up to 15 employees.
the LYNX have already ruled out the contents of a ”katastrofutredning” and to the use of vulgärretorik that there would be a way for the employer to make the employee to the right and to the left. The administration she Noted, is, if possible, even more angry, and are threatening a no-confidence vote on the proposal will be brought forward.
However, the reading section 20 in the Januariavtalet quickly discover that there is no coverage of the far-reaching interpretation. What it boils down to is that the S to change the background in the face of the tough negotiations of the social partners fail to reach agreement on their own, in the autumn of this year.
the union is fighting to preserve the current order, can surprise no one, and is not something that should be a cause of concern, outside of the labor movement's own ranks. (C), and L, to stand up for himself.
the Content is a long way from The idea to scrap the turordningsreglerna completely for all businesses with fewer than 50 employees. It is not out of the question to remove the requirement for ”objective reasons” for the layoffs, which it is alerted in the beginning.
One can always discuss whether the five exceptions, all companies, regardless of size, is the right balance, or whether one model is preferable. However, it is clear that the larger companies find it much easier to deal with difficult personnel matters than the small ones. This is particularly true for layoffs due to personal reasons, in which the tray is often unresponsive, with the annulment of the dismissal, regardless of the facts of the case.
But, as I say, to find the right balance. The union is fighting to preserve the current order, can surprise no one, and is not something that should be a cause of concern, outside of the labor movement's own ranks. (C), and L, to stand up for himself.
READ MORE: ' S-the betrayal of the LAS is a really, really good