The Federal constitutional court may fix the Hartz-IV-law. The SPD fix the the court. Nevertheless, the social democracy could benefit.comment by Heribert Prantl Heribert Prantl
Prof. Dr. Heribert Prantl is a member of the editorial Board of the süddeutsche Zeitung, he has led for 25 years, the Department of the interior policy and is now the head of the departments opinion. He teaches as an honorary Professor for legal studies at the University of Bielefeld. He's right, history and philosophy studied, in parallel, a journalistic training, and in copyright and competition law a doctorate. Before he left in 1988 as political editor for the SZ, he was a Prosecutor and judge in Bavaria. He loves the music of the upper Palatinate, compatriot Christoph Willibald Gluck. When he hears the put by he novels, history books, the "pure legal doctrine", and even the Süddeutsche Zeitung.
Heribert Prantl has written the price of numerous political books and, for the first book, "Germany, flammable" he received the Geschwister-Scholl -. Among its other awards including the science award of the house of Thurn and Taxis, the Kurt-Tucholsky-prize of the rhetoric-the price of the University of Tübingen, Germany, Hildegard Hamm-Brücher-price, of the seven Pfeiffer award, the Wilhelm-Hoegner-price and the Brüder-Grimm-prize of the University of Marburg. For his editorials on the major Christian holidays of the faculty of theology of the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, he was awarded the Dr. h. C. theology. Recent book publications: "In the name of humanity. Save the refugees" (2015); "in Spite of all of this. Europe, you got to love" (2016) and "instructions for use of the populists" (2017).send an email
was The "law on the basic provision for job-seekers", since there is this law, a law on the basic insecurity of the job seekers. This basic uncertainty can mitigate the Federal constitutional court when it tried to Hartz IV, and decides.
The highest court is probably correct in the strict sanction regime, the job centres on the Basis of the Hartz-IV-law does not impose on the unemployed when accepting a Job, or otherwise not sufficiently cooperate. The Federal constitutional court will make a demonstration of whether you can minimise the unemployed, who have given of themselves, really as a penalty, and the existence minimum. The court will explain whether you are allowed to sanction young people are sharper than older ones, or whether or not it is contrary to the principle of equality. It would be good if the highest court in the corrections gelängen that are not managed to the legislature for the year 2005. These corrections to the company is not a presumption of the court, but his task. It is one of the most controversial laws that has existed in Germany ever comes to check the scale of the social rule of law.
The SPD is in addition to, in addition to, and behind
the court may, on the court, the court must. The court must not, cannot, and must repair the law. One can, however, and the court may not: It can not repair the SPD. The SPD is, since then, she has been made under Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, the law, and with the red-green coalition in the Parliament, next to, in addition to, and behind. The shortcut for the decline of the SPD is called Hartz IV, It stands for the alienation of the SPD of the new social strata of the Republic. Hartz IV has led to a new division of the SPD, it has led to the fact that the WASG and the Left has formed. Hartz IV is not the main reason for the disputes and discords to cease in the SPD.
If the country is lucky, you can stabilize the constitutional court with its decision to the social peace. If the SPD could then stabilize again, would be the use of a Collateral.