- Gunnar WetterbergFölj
Coronavårens onödigaste debate is finally over. Under pressure from the opposition, " explained the prime minister to the leaders of the party to granskningskommissionen to come up with its findings in the first quarter of 2022.
At the time, the government has come out with an appointment. At the beginning of may, it was the fact that it would be added to the end of the crisis. Then was the commandment, that, yes, it would be added soon, but the report in the first two months of the election, in 2022. And I have felt Some of Anders Here, in This world, it of course must be made up by the politicians, it was the best way to get all of the questions.
This is bizarre. Probably coronakrisen to be the most important thing that happened during the course of this term. It's going to be doubly important. In addition to a number of different structures have been tried in a real-life situation, and some of them have not been draw near. First, the management has been the government's primary responsibility, over the past few years, and then voters of course get the evidence in order to have their say. (That ought to lead to similar committees in a number of municipalities and county councils – in the last election, it was incomprehensible that the leadership of the Stockholm Region could lag behind.)
it was, of course, that the commission is required to submit a comprehensive assessment, prior to the election. Should the directives be able to open up to more and more reports later on. There may be structures in which the actions need to be investigated in more detail before being taken forward to the referral and decision-making.
It is necessary physicians in order to distinguish between what is coincidental and what is due to the government's and the authorities ' actions and opinions. It is required a degree in political science, in order to assess the performance of the public sector, the structures observed, including the most basic issues, if they for example, a lot, and the local self-government. The writings of philosophers and economists, can contribute to the examination of trade-offs is against the ethics and the economics. It is necessary förvaltningsrevisorer in order to examine the impact of the professional systems are a response to the requirement.
Johan Hirschfeldt, led Katastrofkommissionen response to the tsunami disaster, christmas 2004.Photo by: < / b> by ROGER WAGNER,
Many of these issues are important legal considerations, especially when the conclusions to be drawn, and the proposals are to be designed. Why should the commission president be given. Used by the high court of the former president, president Johan Hirschfeldt and led the tsunamikommissionen with a great deal of integrity. He has many years ' of experience as legal advisor in the prime minister's office in both the Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt, who, Ingvar Carlsson, he was the first attorney-general, and then hovrättspresident. < / span> < / span> < / span>
READ MORE: : Let's get away with their cover-up