the 5000 is an awful high number and I don't think anyone could have ever imagined, that we were going to get”. This Folkhälsomyndigheten, FHM, on 18/6. However, this was not the case, and that was it. Already on 3 april, the prime minister, ”We are going to have to face, they kill by the thousands”. On 29/4 was FHM that ”... between 8 000 and 20 000 participants, may be to die by a coronavirus, is not entirely unreasonable.”
5, the 400 is dead, and over 70,000 of deferred operations, and the confidence in Sweden has reached an all-time low. FHM has directed the coronastrategin, and the prime minister has simply followed suit. People say all the time that things are going well, and that ”we are basically doing the right thing”. It does, of course, we do not take requests to avoid the spread of infection seriously.
”back in 2009, we saw that the beredskapslagerna is not enough, and it hasn't gotten better since then,” said FHM at a press conference held at the beginning of the epidemic. The preparedness should be one of the main tasks of the FHM, and the management should have stepped down, long prior to the corona.
FHM features the two descriptions of his approach. The first one is to keep the bottom of the curve” so that health care and intensivvårdsplatser just enough. However, why not hold a curve, even more if it would save lives? Or, if we had a double sjukhuskapacitet had at the time, the best approach has been one that has led to 10,000 deaths? The second is, ”are we going to protect the elderly”. In the article, ”Where the cynicism is made to the description of the world” (in Swedish) explains why it is impossible to even approach, and that you have to keep an infection at all, and not just to those who are older.
It is unacceptable to FHM's management will change their minds – they're too busy to defend himself,
on The 10th of march, FHM conclude that there is a very high risk of samhällsspridning, and urged people with symptoms to forego social interaction. However, the recommendation on the reservation, for all was not introduced until the 1st of april. The ban of gatherings of more than 50 people were brought in only on the 29th of march. In comparison with our neighbours, we are more critical of weeks.
For dagens nyheter, said the director-general Johan Carlson, that ' the island of Zealand there have been so many cases in sweden has been very low.” However, the number of road deaths per capita are approximately the same in southern sweden and the Danish island of Zealand, and sweden, Skåne has been more and more additions and intensivvårdade than in the whole of the kingdom of Denmark. And when he was pressed on that, it's not necessarily an issue if the price action has been more successful than the Danish, it will be too mocking.
the Interview ends with the director saying, ”And of course it would be easy to do as all the others, then we must, in any case, no criticism.” Well, he's right. If Sweden has done, as all the others had been, it had saved many thousands of lives.
Defamatory on the face of FHM's website says, ”the Mask is not needed in the usual situations in the community, then it is better to keep a distance from other people, and be sure to wash your hands.” This can be misleading. Masks should not take the place of distance, and the hand; they are, of course, be an add-on. It has also been able to stop the smittspårningsappar, despite the fact that there is now a secure and low-cost technology.
It is unacceptable to FHM's management will change their minds – they're too busy to defend themselves. It is virtually impossible to dismiss a director-general, and so we will have to find other ways in order to prevent the death rate in Sweden continued to be among the highest in the world. For example, the responsibility to make recommendations to the general public, will be moved to the Swedish national Board of health, or the PROGRAM.
We all have a responsibility,
One of the positive developments is that the political parties outside the government have begun to operate in order to reduce the infection. Another is that of the journalists. At times, it is now for them to ask, even though FHM is jättekomplext” or ”not important.”
Each and every lost day means the unnecessary death and invalidiseringar, and a loss of confidence in the rest of the world, and for all of us. Politicians from all the political parties, journalists, employees of the government – all we need is our responsibility. < / span> < / span>
as the Professor of mathematical statistics at Chalmers university of technology and Gothenburg university, is conducting research regarding the extreme risks.
READ MORE: - 23 users-To limit the number of deaths that's your job, Tegnell READ MORE: Folkhälsomyndighetens three critical mistakes. READ MORE: