Ida Alterås, and The ungdomsförbunds the tone of his voice, is an example of how the american migrationsdebatt evolved into a race of posering, and tactics, rather than tangible, and the long-term policy.
Then, in the autumn of 2015, and PROBABLY argued in favour of a joint and several responsibility of the EUROPEAN union, an extensive system of quotas and extend assistance in order to help more and more people are on the site of the krisernas surrounding areas. We are still in the.
as the world has changed and new challenges have emerged, however, we have re-examined the other parts of our immigration policy. An example of this is our vision of how the right of asylum in the EUROPEAN union, which, in practice, the disadvantaged, the most vulnerable people on the run, and given the refugee smugglers have power to decide as to who will get the opportunity to apply for asylum.
I'm not ashamed of that, and PROBABLY has developed their immigration policy in recent years
however, It is clear that the Cuf does not update the analysis at all.
the Dream of the freedom of migration will remain, and will be financed through a allow the newly-arrived ”qualify” himself for the people's welfare. It is not clear whether this is a child's education, health care, public housing or a family allowance, which shall be made subject to conditions, but that the Cuf is using his liberal immigration policies as a weapon against the Swedish general welfare model is evident.
This is the hypocrisy needs to be highlighted. It is not humane to lock them out of the newly-arrived, from well-being. The integration will not be enhanced by the increase in economic inequality and insecurity. Cuf's ideas would only aggravate exclusion and poverty.
a reduction in taxes for the wealthiest
The Ida Alterå to give priority to lower taxes for Sweden's richest people, in front of more resources to the welfare system undermines their credibility in the integrationsdebatten in total.
this PROBABLY wants to be Sweden to be an open and egalitarian land, who will be responsible for all of the people who live here. To get a residence permit have equal opportunity to be a part of our society to the full. It is an obligation.
the Swedish mottagandenivå needs to be in line with our ability to provide a high quality and equitable integration, and the state must shoulder its responsibilities and to provide the municipalities such as Geelong, more resources in order to meet the requirements of well-being.
and I'm not ashamed of that, and PROBABLY has developed their immigration policy in recent years. On the contrary, the. To re-examine their policies, you realize that it is not sufficient is not to turn the coat after the wind, without having to take on the responsibility of finding better answers to difficult problems.
this is Where Cuf and Ida Alterå is something to be learned. < / span> < / span>
the Chairman of the SSU.
READ MORE: , Philip Botström is the biggest hypocritical. READ MORE: , Philip Botström: ”I'm disgusted by the hypocrisy”. READ MORE: It was in the M policies that paved the way for the flyktingkrisenBMW beat the competition – this is the best laddhybriden