DN Debate. If Löfven is a politician, he lets Loof get to be prime minister

The most beautiful and most admired move in chess is said to be when a player sacrifices his queen, which is the game's strongest and most impactful piece. It is a fairly rare trait, but is found in some very special situations where either all other options have been exhausted or when there is a possibility that with such a bold move set the opponent checkmate and thus win the game. You can, I mean, the claim that american policy is now facing such a critical situation where a solution requires both courage and creativity.

the Situation is as familiar to no partikonstellation in the present can be formed to create a government supported by parliament. During the election campaign, political parties have locked themselves in the promises of with whom they might rule, and, above all, not to reign, which now makes it impossible to establish a viable government. At the same time, all parties except The sweden democrats avoid a new election, not least because such a probably would not resolve the situation. Opinion polls seem to show that we would get a very similar result as the one we now have. The large costs that such a new election would bring with it was not appreciated by many voters.

The latter, therefore, that those with some right assume that if they choose to be included in an S-led government, then their constituents will punish them hard.

Damoffret is a fairly rare trait, but is found in some very special situations where either all other options have been exhausted or when there is a possibility that with such a bold move set the opponent checkmate and thus win the game.

Conservatives and socialists definitely do not want to rule together, and their voters would probably not appreciate such cooperation. Ever since the bitter quarrels between Ingvar Carlsson and Carl Bildt in the aftermath of the economic crisis in 1991 is the suspicion between these parties closest to the abyss. A ”storkoalition” of the German model seems therefore to be excluded.

If the resulting political knots to be able to be solved must be any party in this critical juncture, to come forward and show that they take responsibility for the country by daring to do a ”damoffer”. If the election is to be avoided, it must simply to a government. Many things are at stake in this position, not least Sweden's international reputation as a country with a stable democracy and well-functioning public institutions. It is something that market players seem to dismiss keen as it is to political uncertainty.

Such, the party has done in the past, the most famous is the historic settlement with the Agrarians in 1932, which laid the foundation for thus aiming to undo and large parts of the welfare policy.

the social democrats have to realize that it would be political suicide for the Centre party, and not least the Liberals to be included in a spd-led government. With high probability, would in any case the Liberals, after such an agreement fall out of the riksdag. The social democrats ' main strategy is simply irrelevant realism. However, there are reasons to assume that mittenpartiernas voters would accept a government led by both parties and where the social democrats included. There is no rule in our constitution that supports Stefan Löfvens principle that the largest party in a government constellation shall be in possession of statsministerposten.

the Criterion for what is usually referred to as statesmanship is when a politician chooses to put the country's interest before their own interest, and in his party's prestige and power. Stefan Löfven now has the ability to show such statesmanship by drop, until a government with Annie Lööf and the prime minister and two deputy prime ministers, Jan Björklund at the Swedish foreign MINISTRY, and Magdalena Andersson at the Swedish ministry of finance.

Many things are at stake in this position, not least Sweden's international reputation as a country with a stable democracy and well-functioning public institutions.

the green Party can be included in such a government constellation, but one can also imagine a solution of the model as Göran Persson created, namely that the party is included in the regeringsunderlaget but not in the government. Instead, the party a number of political experts in the government which may affect the proposals for the policy to be more direct. Löfven himself would certainly be an excellent näringslivsminister.

the Alliance between the four bourgeois parties ends. The moderates and The sweden democrats are held outside and, not least important, one can point out that with this maneuver, get to his long-awaited blocköverskridande government.

this will, of course, an important argument, namely that Sweden would finally get its first woman as prime minister. There is something uncanny, not to say embarrassing, with ”the world's most equal country” has not yet succeeded with this. You will for gender equality in progressive in the country not to underestimate the symbolic value of a woman on the statsministerposten. With the particular right would the social democrats with this manoeuvre to be able to take the credit for this historical injustice between the sexes in our country wiped out. When all of our neighbours managed to get a woman in the highest political position in the country, it should now also be Sweden's turn.

In the political rhetoric, although the differences between the parties ' policies are great but if you look at the policies that actually took place during the governments Reinfeldt and Persson, they are in a historical and international perspective, relatively small.

Could such a government survive? Friend of order might reasonably point out that it actually would not have a majority in the parliament. Including the green party would only collect 167 mandate which is 8 fewer than what you need to achieve majority.

But it is hard to imagine that the Left party would act together with the SD, M and KD in order to trap such a government. What would be the option for them other than a government becomes dependent on, The sweden democrats? Such conduct would the V have a very hard time to defend before their constituents. They will, in all likelihood, after receiving their own motions rejected, would rather abstain than to make common cause with M, KD, and SD.