in A year or two ago asked me a few högstadiekillar a couch in the middle of the hallway at a high school in Lidköping, sweden. When they refused to move, they lifted the teacher off is one of them, in the back of the neck. The learner is notified and the Child and school student representative, went to the court to require the municipality is liable for damages.
the e-mail was the refusal of the district court and the court of appeals, both of which took the view that the teacher has done their job to maintain law and order in the school.
In this case, there was no question of any improper treatment of the Skollagens sense, because the intervention is ”to immediately (and achieved) to get to the end of the ordningsstörningen in a situation where the student did not obey the calls of he's got to get up off the couch”.
the Child and school student representative Hayley Hedstig were grumbling about the obscure law and the case law, however, the minister for education, Anna Ekström (S) that way.
”It is, of course, is an indicative ruling, which makes clear that schools have a duty to enforce it, and where to draw the line when it comes to abuse. I think that gives flesh on the bones of the matter about what the school must do in these situations is,” said she, appealed to the ROTOR.
the Child and school student representative Hayley Hedstig were grumbling about the obscure law and the case law, however, the minister for education, Anna Ekström (S) that way.
In the case of a pupil in the city and did it not matter that the police dropped the investigation, and considered e-mail. Not that both the district court and the court of appeal went on its route. The case would be all the way up in ME.
It would hardly be the first time you run it. E-mail has, in effect, put in strange claims in the system. At one point, you could go to the court that the president has shown a nude photo, which is a 15-year-old boy sent to a girl, the boy's parents. They had been able to talk about it”, said Malin Hedstig, then, and called out to 15,000 dollars. Also, when the judge of the district court against it.
the city and the case will illustrate this with precision. The boy has autism and is, therefore, a specific ”plan of action” to say that he should be treated with caution. However, the teacher who removed him were not aware of this, since the school is quite large, and the service of the summons on the individual action plans for teachers are considered offensive in and of itself.
in the put an end to the farce. Put down the e-mail.
READ MORE: , Put down the e-mail – the government should not be standing on the bully's side. READ MORE: , as the School's troublemakers, should not have the damages awarded