Rarely is the sentiment of the nation turned, as quickly as this spring. In march and april are dominated by the self-righteous Sweden's image in the public eye. Sweden is considered to be a little bit smarter than the rest.
Here, we had The ”Swedish Model”, which, among other things, that the government let the experts take care smittbekämpningen unlike other countries, which acted as the more populist of the purpose of political expediency.
in recent weeks, Sweden has begun to flake off. The mortality rate is through the roof on our nordic neighbouring countries and raise international fear. The project is no longer welcome as a tourist in many places, but can be regarded as a pariah.
at home, the reality is also have had time to catch up. The government's initiative of the 100 000 tests in a week has broken down and it is one of the review for the second of the major flaws in the approach to the protection of the elderly.
to Get the voters to allow themselves to be persuaded by the argument that the prime minister, indeed, is frustrated with the realities on the ground.
The regimtrogna point of view, has given way to the critical question, and the general, and international comparisons to be made. The whole of this debate has been syresatts. The opposition has come to life, the new experts will be placed in the public domain and media reports have begun to examine the efforts to date.
the government stressed, is significant. Fingerpekandet is in full swing; the prime minister said to be ”frustrated” at the lack of testing, while the minister for social protection, ms Lena Hallengren was a disappointed, says she was ”naive”. The blame for the debacle on the tests, however, is primarily that of the government itself.
the Whole set-up to allow the Folkhälsomyndigheten is responsible for the English strategy – the strike is now back in the government. In a national emergency, the government will always be held responsible. Few voters are going to allow themselves to be persuaded by the argument that the prime minister, indeed, is frustrated with the realities on the ground.
you have to constantly be on your toes – review, mutual learning and the set. What seems to have worked in Norway and Germany? What went less well?
For all those defense it should be said that this pandemic is a hugely complex crisis. At the end of march, I wrote a column titled, ”I'm not going to pretend that I am cocksure” (28/3). It was all about the unique, hard-to-assess coronakrisen as the grounds for decision-making are changing all the time: ”Coronakrisen is reminiscent of driving in the dark in the worst possible weather conditions”, I wrote.
the virus remains unpredictable. Now, it seems like there is less in the presence than in the past, we've thought of it, that it is as klustersmitta, and that no other country is close to achieving herd immunity. However, after a few weeks, the picture has been revised again, and the results of the antikroppstesterna find themselves in a new light. We simply do not know. It's the final answer, we get the first of something, or a couple of years.
This is what has become of this pandemibekämpnings spirit: to deal with a lot of uncertainty, and at the same time to move forward. This can best be done by having an open mind and not lock down on some of the assumptions made.
Unfortunately, it is not the humble attitude that has prevailed in Folkhälsomyndigheten. On the contrary, other countries ' strategies been met with suspicion, and the critics have been dismissed by the challenges of their motives.
in Sweden, the right, and all of the other countries are wrong. Despite the fact that a lot of the world has largely adopted the requirement of a face mask in public places, Anders Tegnell hard to resist.
A similar scepticism has been expressed in view of the masstestning: ”The test is not an end in itself” hit the Tegnell in the early firm. Late in the week, underlined the authority to numerären is not that important, but that the test is ”effective”. That is to say, the testing of all of the symptoms of the covid-19 is not required.
One gets the impression that there was some sort of bunkermentalitet the Folkhälsomyndigheten.
at the same time, it is very much about the English approach, which remains unclear. In comparison with other countries, we know very little about the agency's assumptions. In direct questions, denying Anders Tegnell, that the herd immunity would not be the case, but without it, the principle appears to be that the Swedish approach, which doesn't make sense.
Sometimes it is, other countries are going to have a lot of trouble in the future. At other times it is called for Sweden to have the same approach as any other.
the Government has to therefore listen to the voices of the larger number of votes. An exceptionally clear voices have emerged in the public eye in the last couple of weeks, namely, the Life of the Cases, a professor of epidemiology, and nancy Linde, a former statsepidemiolog.
Both of the recommended that Sweden should invest in, to try as far as possible, isolate the sick, and the smittspåra as much as possible. In some parts of the country, it is already possible to work according to the model. In the other direction, you can at least suppress the infection with the help of these methods.
There ought to be an obvious choice. Such an infrastructure should have already been in place, but it is better late than never. < / span> < / span>
READ MORE: to Push down the infection, so that will eventually become clean again. READ MORE: , Sweden is lagging hopelessly behind in the smittbekämpningen READ MORE: , I'm not going to pretend that I'm cocksure