An elderly man holds for a Karin Keller-Sutter , research-based, with a challenging glance. A little queasy she had already, told the Federal councillor. "What's coming to me now?" The man had introduced himself as a shooter and gun nut. But instead of a rant you got during your visit at the six bells to hear something quite different: The revised arms act that the 19. May also be as a shooter agree.
The anecdote sprinkled the Federal councillor this week at the Pädagogische Hochschule Zürich as random. She holds a lecture on "new weapons law and Schengen/Dublin" followed by a panel discussion. She weaves even more times, such private experiences. About 70 people tried cellar to convince Sutter to a Yes. The mood is charged, in the question and answer session of the one or the other disgruntled citizens is heard. But it's still decent.
the posh has contributed back-end type of Keller-Sutter, always attentive, and the eye contact searching, but in the statements clear and unambiguous: No German officials, their arguments with concrete examples and impressing Figures untermauernd.
the Vote kick-off was in February in Bern in front of the media is not easy. It was Keller-Sutter's first appearance as Minister of justice, and it had in it. Because the legacy of Simonetta Sommaruga weighed heavily. The social Democrat, had calm down in the parliamentary debate, the effort to Protect and members of the army. Your asseveration that will change hardly anything, not caught. The Protect, seconded by the SVP, taken in the Referendum.
Keller-Sutter increased with other conditions as Sommaruga in the vote fight. As a former St. Gallen police Director through the handle hard. As a liberal it is with protecting tradition, and the abolition of the army, is it not – that you are relieved from the suspicion of being secretly a weapons opponent. And then, Keller-Sutter of the once active pistol shooter.
But even this availed her little in: Werner Salzmann, SVP national councillor and President of the referendum Committee, scored in accordance with the Voting kick-off from all the pipes is that they lead the people with specific false statements in the wrong, your comments were of the "A to Z wrong".
A few weeks after the start of the campaign Salzmann and Keller-Sutter, on the show "Arena". And here, too, substantiated the Federal councillor of your comments with a personal. She uses this rhetorical resources. It creates proximity and revives dry content.
First, they documented their personal ties with the protect tradition with the note, to lay that at your home once weapons around. That's not what disturbed you. The policy statement follows: The administrative hurdles for Protecting in the new law are reasonable. She says that, often, reasonable. With your Background that is not perceived as a threat rather than appeasement.
Suddenly, the finger
Salzmann show, your opponents in the "Arena", speaks more of a ban. Even if in the law for the newly prohibited semi-automatic weapons Exemptions are provided. But on the Person of Salzmann is not playing here. He can't, and Keller-Sutter has little attack surface.
A little different when it comes to dispute, how much the Schengen/Dublin – agreement with the EU that would be a no to the weapons act invalid – Switzerland. And if the EU is phasing out this really could be? Keller-Sutter is trying in this point to appease the opponents in the "Arena" for the time being. So she is the first to admit that Switzerland would not have revised without pressure from Brussels, this law in this Form. But you also said that Switzerland will not be without the connected databases so sure, and that more asylum seekers are coming from.
she tried to let the non-threatening appearance. But the discussion is more hateful. Salzmann, meanwhile, with a significantly red-head, takes Keller-Sutter directly into the visor. You could certainly have to renegotiate, the EU had no interest in that Switzerland not to join these agreements. The Federal Council and you as the responsible Minister of justice would have to make an effort.
Trying to keep with factual arguments, however, cannot hide the councillor of their tension. She parried the attacks with his index finger, a gesture that can be perceived as a threat. But it seems, as you would have noticed this immediately. Shortly thereafter, she highlights areas of your comments again with an open hand.
the praise of the opponent
"whenever a vote topic mixed in with the Europe question, to hardened fronts and is subject to reproach, that the Federal Council is aiming for actually joining the EU," says Keller-Sutter this week after discussion at the Pedagogical University of Zurich. The accusation that she fights for a Yes, they do not apply. You simply got requests for a public discussion events, and certainly not from the opposition: "I would be also increased in the Rössli or anywhere else in the Ring."
The Federal councillor'm not so bad, says Ines Kessler, who has followed the appearance of the University. The young woman is an aspiring box maker and actively promotes a 'no'. She was already in the "Arena" with a dedicated vote. From your mouth to the evaluation sounds almost like a compliment. However, to change his mind, you could not – never.
Created: 19.04.2019, 18:59 PM