"...and Leif GW Persson don't need to open the wallet"
"Niklas Krämer and his colleague took on his own volition fixed dieseltjuvarna at his place of work – now acquits Solna district court them for the prosecution of unlawful detention."
"the district Court considers, however, that they made a wrong envarsgripande – but weighing in the fact that they thought that they acted right."
"I am so grateful that they weighed out what we thought in this situation, it is absolutely fantastic," says Niklas Creams."
"Niklas Creams, 25, and his colleague, got tired of the thieves brazen dieselstölder from the workplace in Warri and arrested one of the thieves. They tied him in the expectation that the police would come and arrest him, in accordance with the law on envarsgripande they believed. "
"the preliminary Investigation regarding the theft was shut down – because the suspected thief left the country. In september brought the prosecution instead of prosecution for unlawful deprivation of liberty the applicable Niklas Krämer and his colleague. "
"– Staring themselves blind on the guidelines for a envarsgripande so it seems that we have done wrong, but if you look at the whole picture so I think we should be wooed, " said Niklas Creams to Aftonbladet then. "
"In the day the verdict was handed down in the Solna district court – that justifieth Niklas and his colleague. The judge's overall assessment is that their actions do not constitute unlawful detention. The right write, among other things, that there was any uncertainty about that, the men took hold of the right person, to the cable ties used to tie the thief used with caution and that it must be considered that, in terms of the situation, was correct to apprehend the thief as dangerous. "
"– which stone lightens, for one's own sake, it is absolutely fantastic, Now we can end it here, now it's over, " says Niklas Creams to Aftonbladet. "
"Thought they were acting right."
"the Right mean that the behaviour cannot be counted as envarsgripande because the offender was not arrested in flagrante delicto or fleeing feet. Niklas and his colleague arrested the thief when he came back the next morning to retrieve his car. "
"Right write that you must take into consideration that Niklas and his colleague acted in the belief that they made the right, they had not any intent to commit a crime. The district court also writes that although the fact that they have been in contact with the police the evening before, and when they grabbed the thief must be taken into account. "
"They have, according to the district court acted to ensure that the arrested person would promptly be handed over to the police. Their data on the content of these contacts may, in the absence of any other information is accepted and it can therefore not be considered shown, other than their belief that they have acted legally in different ways has been confirmed, or not been challenged. There are, according to the district court's opinion, nothing in their behaviour that suggest that they even considered that the action was not within the tillåtnas limit,” writes the district court."
"Leif GW Persson has offered to pay the fine if there had been a conviction. Now you don't have kriminologiprofessorn shell out with money."
"– it Had become a conviction as I had been on Brottsjournalen in the week and their producer said to me that GW had been standing firm on his word and paid our fines. All credit to him for it. Now it is not so, I buy the district court's judgment and is grateful that they weighted what we thought of the situation, " says Niklas Creams."