warning, the following story may be incorrect: 24. July last year, in the morning shortly after eight o'clock, went to a 25-year-old Algerian in Zurich's district 4 to a prostitute, pulled out a pocket knife and demanded money. As the 29-year-old Spaniard said she had no money, he demanded Sex. At the top of the room on the bed managed to the woman in any way, to wring from the man, the knife, the man cut he suffered injuries to the right Hand. Finally, the Spaniard was able to escape. The Algerian was arrested and in custody put.
warning, the following story might also be wrong: On 24. July last year, in the morning shortly after eight o'clock, went to a 25-year-old Algerian to a prostitute and asked for the cost for sexual services. On the 100 francs was quickly agreed to. As the man took the money from his belly-pocket, and looked at the woman, in the pocket, much more money was. A pocket knife, threatened repeated to the man and tried to the money seem to take it in the belly bag. When trying to get the wife to take away the knife, was injured by the Algerians, especially on the right Hand. He filed a criminal complaint with the police. The woman was arrested and in custody put.
What confused now? The man in the robbery attempt and the attempted rape guilty? Or the wife has committed a robbery attempt velvet body injury and is also suspected to have the Algerians, against his better Knowledge of massive crimes accused of? Prior to this question, the Zurich district court on Monday. And before this, the Spanish state – presumably due to an embarrassing error. Because according to a report by the Forensic Institute Zurich (FOR) was on the knife, the DNA of the woman's grip, mainly, on the bloody blade of the DNA of the man. With other words: The woman had kept the knife in Hand, was the alleged perpetrator.
According to this result, the Algerians were released after a month in custody. Where he is today, is not known. But the FOR had confounded the persons, as the Institute of legal medicine found months later in a report. It was exactly the opposite, the so-called main track encoders on the handle of the man. Because of the handle but also DNA of a woman was, the Prosecutor in its original version and accused the woman.
blood on the bed
But the district court acquitted the woman of the charges of attempted robbery, false accusation and assault. According to the results of the DNA analysis both Tatversionen be possible. But the portrayal of the woman contained "many-to-life Details" that would be absent in a fictional story. In contrast, the Algerians contradictory out I says and information the results of the investigation to be adjusted.
but Above all: On the bed was found the blood of the man. The bed was only in the Tatversion of the woman. To serve instead of a part of the sentence of imprisonment of thirty months, the single mother of three children with 29400 francs to go home. It is the compensation for 294 days wrongly taken on remand. (Tages-Anzeiger)
Created: 14.05.2019, 09:17 PM