Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Threesome is for the court, not a rape

don't be stood in the attitude to the discussion, but only the question of whether the facts of the case beyond reasonable doubt to be created, the judge said

- 11 reads.

Threesome is for the court, not a rape

don't be stood in the attitude to the discussion, but only the question of whether the facts of the case beyond reasonable doubt to be created, the judge said after the acquittal in the district court of Dietikon. The process was on 12.November, to the exclusion of the Public been carried out, yesterday, the verdict was announced.

was the behavior of 18 and 19-year-old Swiss is not a page of glory, the judge said. He hoped that the procedure was both a lesson. And you should not be happy too early, because if the attorney for the moving the process to the Supreme court is still open.

The young men, in October 2016 in a party room in the basement of a multi-family house in the Limmattal, a 17-year-old girl sexually assaulted and raped were accused of. The two apprentices, one was a former friend of the girl, should have made the sexual intercourse to third-party against the will of the young woman. Of a "Threesome" was in the process of speech.

No forced Situation

For the court were in the charge described allegations to be plausible, it could have been so, as the Chairman said. The Vision of the mobile phone film, which one of the two accused in the Sex, had made, was not clear became clear that the young woman found the Situation good, but it was not a forced Situation can be seen.

Therefore, an acquittal in accordance with the principle "in dubio pro reo" (Latin for: in doubt for the accused). The woman didn't leave the movie a frustrated, but not terrified impression. "It must have happened in the room, something the woman massively." For the court, the young woman was not a liar, said the judge.

you have not enjoyed the Sex and felt bad, "but she has been through".

The Chairman outlined a possible course of events that night three years ago. The 17-Year – old initially said no to the Threesome didn't last, because she was afraid that something will get out to the Public and your reputation including suffering. On the assurance of her former friend that she could count on discretion, she can change her mind. You have not enjoyed the Sex and felt bad, "but she has been through".

That the assurance of confidentiality was not respected and one of the two accused told shortly after that a colleague via SMS, was only "underground", the judge said.

Created: 22.11.2019, 20:03 PM

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.