Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


These communities lose the most votes

133 times as likely to have been overruled under iberger at the ballot box in the last 37 years. Of the 41 percent of votes . This is a Switzerland shows a wide analysis of the voting results of the years 1981 to 2018.

the evaluation of a Mainstream can be a belt that runs from Bern, over the densely populated Mediterranean country to the Metropolitan area of Zurich and St. Gallen, with foothills to Basel and Schaffhausen. Lower Compliance can be found in the West of Switzerland and the Canton of Ticino, as well as generally in more rural areas. Strikingly, the Grisons country, which has, in spite of rural structures, a high level of Consistency with the whole of Switzerland is.

The lowest values are found in the Central part of Switzerland (Unteriberg, 41 percent) and in the Jura (Eder wiler 38 percent). "I'm quite Proud of my municipality, so as to be quickly influenced by the Mainstream," says Edy Marty-Spindor, party President of the municipality of Unteriberg.

Although it is only 50 kilometers to Zurich were, was the remoteness of the community clearly felt. Nevertheless, no Frustration building up. The financial compensation flow for a lot of money from the financial stronger Schwyzer communities at the lake of Zurich in Unteriberg. Since the community benefits from it, takes Marty-Spindor in purchase that you should add in the case of certain decisions of the majority, whether you believe this or not.

at The other Extreme are the municipalities, the vote most frequently the same as the whole of Switzerland: Ebikon (Luzern), Neuenegg and Langenthal (both Bern), for example, all have voted 95 percent the same as the whole of Switzerland and count, so to speak, to the political Mainstream.

That Ebikon is particularly an average, has also been established in the year 2014 by the ETH (the Swiss daily reported). At that time, doctoral students of the ETH have tried, the results of the election of Switzerland on the basis of the results of individual municipalities to predict. They did this with Ebikon particularly well. In 96 percent of cases, they were able to close the Ebikoner result on the overall Swiss results.

Further, one can examine how frequently individual municipalities in the past votes on the piece "correctly", i.e. in Accordance with the overall Swiss results have located. This shows that, in Rapperswil-Jona, Jenins and Thusis voted in the last 55 votes equal to the whole of Switzerland. The last Time wrong these municipalities are located at the 3. March 2013 at the time of the vote to the "Federal resolution on family policy". Here they voted contrary to the Mainstream, no. The template was then rejected in fact, because of the lack of Ständemehrs, whereby the municipalities were again correctly. A total of four referendum proposals have failed in the considered period due to the Ständemehrs.

The map shows the status of municipalities as of 1. January 2018. In total, there were at this time 2222 municipalities in Switzerland. The vote data are processed by the Federal office for statistics. Take into account all of the votes since the 14th century. March 1981 to 23. September 2018.

The results of municipalities that no longer exist due to municipal mergers, were taken into account accordingly in the new municipalities. For 21 municipalities, no values could not be calculated, since they are completely. These municipalities are shown in the map in grey. Further, there are twelve municipalities, in each of which two municipalities have shared urns. There was indicated in each case, the combined result of both municipalities.


Created: 17.05.2019, 11:49 PM

Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.