Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Actor Manchin Jackson Milwaukee Bucks Lori Loughlin

reads.

The rules around cheating students is unclear
"The rules around cheating students are unclear"

"What happens with högskolefuskarnas score?"

"the Rules are unclear, which the government immediately should do something about."

"the Men behind the organized and advanced högskolefusket was sentenced last week to up to six years in prison. Harsh punishment, but so too was the crime of an attack on the entire antagningssystemet."

"were Also 23 people who cheated on the sat to fines and conditionally for, as the crime is named, the untrue declaration. Are they the judges? The prosecutor has appealed and require imprisonment."

"the Results withdrawn"

"Aftonbladet's reporter Natalia Kazmierska have talked with some of them and read the pre-trial investigation. Some testify to anxiety about the future and pressure from surroundings to succeed. The other denies the crime. Still others are critical of the scholastic aptitude test as such and consider themselves as having the moral right to buy themselves a place on the drömutbildningen."

"the Common feature is that the University and högskolerådet has withdrawn or will withdraw their results in the scholastic aptitude test."

"It is now up to universities to decide whether students should be thrown out of their courses. And this is just the beginning. A further couple of hundred names found in the fuskligans customer records are being investigated."

"It may be so that some may keep its place. Or get rid of it but get to keep the points that have tentats of. Points that look good on a cv or will come to use in other training."

"the Problem is that the legal situation is unclear. How should people who trixed into a sought-after education, but passed exams without cheating be handled?"

"the Issue has been assessed differently by experts. Some believe that if it was wrong from the beginning, it follows the error with. Others have come to the conclusion that universities and colleges should refrain from revoking the degrees and diplomas in the absence of clear rules."

"This is a rättssäkerhetsfråga. Withdrawn score, it is possible to argue that a degree based on the score that no longer applies shall be null and void. On the exam, which is the basis for a professional certification is revoked may, in turn, will be questioned."

"A knock-on effect that can have terrible results. It is not reasonable that a doctor or psychologist after let's say 20 years of perfectly service of the job because of a misleading default, in the dawn of time."

"this legal uncertainty has led to institutions acting in different ways. Lund university has for the past seven years, has withdrawn two betygsbeslut. Uppsala university considers that the approved grade for the course will remain. Stockholm university has appealed to the politicians for guidance."

"the Confusion is, as you can see, total."

"today the general rule is that the promotion decision of the authorities may not be to the detriment of the individual. A university may not hipp that happ throw out the people that have come in."

"It's a good order. And if exceptions are to be made, there should be an express legal legal support for the action."

"Matilda Ernkrans, newly appointed socialist minister for higher education and research, have in recent days demanded that universities must be tough on these issues."

"the Question is, how many tough follow-up questions the minister would clear. She believes that universities should yawn to the rule of law and sound the horn and run?"

"It is not reasonable that the universities themselves should have to make these decisions. It is not fair to the cheating student A in Lund of all, while similarly, the cheating student (B) in Uppsala to maintain the grades."

"the Rules need to be clearer. Act, högskoleminister Ernkrans."

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.