The guard who intervened against pregnant spread racism in the Flashbackkonto

the Crackdown on the Hötorget metro station against a pregnant, black woman on 31 January in the year led to the consequences of the two ordningsvakterna could not foresee. After a conflict with the ticket inspectors inside of a subway train called the two guards to the spot and brought out the woman out on the platform. Before filming individuals, they placed then the woman with the belly and face down, on a bench, at the same time as several people protested against the management.

On social media criticised the crackdown against the woman in order to, inter alia, have been an example of racism. In an interview with DN denies one of the guards – known as security guard (A) – decided this accusation.

" I don't care well in what she has to skin color or background or whatever it is, he said at the time.

that an account in Flashback as the man can be linked to have been used to write posts with racist content over a number of years.

In a post from december 2014, it says ' What had really happened if the police had the powers to shoot to death the monkeys?” in the context of a discussion about the riots in a suburb of stockholm. Further down in the post it says: ”Some time must, of course, the cops put the foot down and shoot the skull of any monkey out there, so they will be quiet as well.”

In October of the same year posted a post in a thread about immigration to Sweden. In the post used the words ”gruppvåldtäktsblod” and ”tiggarblod” some immigrants claimed to have in themselves.

On several occasions between the years 2014 and 2019 are made post through the account, where the words ”svarting”, ”blatte” and ”negro” is used, and the reasoning about the differences between black and white is maintained.

Shortly after the intervention on the Hötorget in 2019, there is also a post where it is said that ”black is undoubtedly noisier than what white is”, a reference to the recent case of the pregnant woman. ”They will be rowdy for nothing, and then we must not forget that later on you as a guard should be standing there in front of a police officer or a judge in court”.

how the two guards who intervened at the Haymarket also made an intervention in may last year against a group of friends in a much-publicized event at Fridhemsplan. At the moment, including the security guard had one hand in a deathgrip on a woman as he sat astride, turned the whole thing into a physical confrontation between the guards and a group of friends – which meant that they were only trying to protect themselves against the guards were ”unjustified” violence. The guards on their side, referred to the fact that several people in the gang were guilty of violence against officials.

In a post, a few days after the incident at Fridhemsplan, it is said that from the current guard's account in the Flashback to ”blatteungen” – with reference to one of the members of a group of friends – ”sure got an attitude” and that he has become ”rejected, but not listened”.

a Little further down in the same thread on the forum will be reasoning about the event from the same account that ”one should take the rules of the game” if it ”settles in tjänsteutövningar”. According to the reasoning, this can ”mean pain, in the worst case, perhaps a bullet in them.”

the Account has been active since 2009 and has since published thousands of posts, many of these with several different personal data DN been able to use to tie the guard to the account. When the DN comes in contact with the man, he will confirm that the account is his.

the security guard A is, however, determined that his behaviour in the work is not racially influenced. He also comments that the intervention in Fridhemsplan in may 2018, which he called one of the people ”blatteungen”.

" I think nothing specific about it. I'm not going to comment any further about it either. I don't know the context in which it has been written in so I can't comment on it.

" No. It is wrong. But it is, as I said. I will not comment on anything.

" I've had Ubuntu since 2009 and I have probably written 1.000–2.000 posts, I would guess. There are certainly a lot of things that you can find out which one can safely question. I am not flawless in any way.

the Man describes the choice of words like ”distressing” and nothing that he uses in his ”everyday language”. It is also not something that represents someone's opinion of him, he claims.

" I'm not as directly politically engaged, and I don't care much neither about immigration policy or anything like that.

– Have I written it? But at the time I was working not even within the security industry whatsoever. I was 20 years old then. I mean, any moderation it may well still be, I think.

" No, absolutely not. It is clear that there is nothing I would sit and write in the date directly. I hardly use the Flashback in the day. I mean I have full up with work, I'm very busy with my life. To sit on the internet and hate on people, and here and there, there is nothing that I directly make.

– When you are 20, it is clear that you are an adult. But it all depends on. You are not fully developed as a 20-year-old, purely biological. It is you almost might be the first when you are 25. Then one can say that the brain is fully developed.

" Yes, yes, absolutely. It is not... It is not okay to keep on like that. It is not. It is clear that you have said or written nonsense. It has all made.