The acting head of the US-aviation authority FAA defended at a hearing in Congress, the existing authorisation procedures for aircraft. Boeing 737 Max plane will stay on the ground.
how Much responsibility the US-FAA FAA is responsible for the crisis at Boeing? At the hearing before Congress, the acting head of the authority, Elwell, the witnesses, the existing procedure for the admission of air, defended. Part of this is that employees of a company like Boeing to do many of the Checks themselves.
"I think if we have strict controls and us conflicts, which is not the case Protect it from interests, then we have a good System. But it can always be improved and that's about it."
could be Calculated on the checks it issues. The Wall Street Journal had reported that senior officials from the FAA for the Boeing 737 Max is a new System for flight control, called not reviewed of M-CAS. You would not have monitored the examination. Elwell is surprised.
Crucial problems in the flight control
"We all of the articles and allegations to be taken seriously. But in the report, which would be aware."
The newspaper reported that Boeing had not classified the MCAS System as safety-relevant. The FAA chief admitted that the problem with the flight control system are crucial for the safety of the Boeing 737.
Daniel Elwell, acting head of the US-aviation authority FAA>
declared Some deputies, that US pilots can easily deal with the Situation in the Cockpit. Others criticized that the manufacturer, Boeing, had not mentioned the System to support the flight controls in the manual for the 737 Max.a lot of uncertainty
A recording from the November 2018, supports the suspicions. The television station CBS has released recordings, in which Boeing's Vice Sinnet defended.
Boeing didn't want to overwhelm the Crews with unnecessary information. But the aircraft manufacturer is hardly out of the headlines. The uncertainty is large since the crash of the two aircraft 737 Max witnesses from type within a few months. 346 people were killed. Aircraft of this series since the second crash on the ground.shareholders are up in arms
In the case of the Boeing-annual General meeting a few weeks ago, private investors attacked suddenly to the microphone. Small shareholders, such as Bright Robbins.
"I worry that in the controls too much is in flux, that there is no clear separation between the supervision of the FAA and Boeing's own Tests. This results in a conflict.
the chief of The US air traffic control authority Elwell said in the Congress, there is still no date for a re-registration of the aircraft. Elwell's afraid of the criticism of his authority could have negative consequences.hearing only the first step
follow Boeing gets to feel: The chief of Ethopian Airlines, brought Mariam said in the TV channel NBC that his Airline would resume as one of the last operation with the 737 Max. A machine of the Ethopian was in March
not an accident "I'm still not sure if this machine will fly again for us. Maybe. If we are convinced, and pilots and passengers will be able to convince you."
all Of them seem to be still far away. Also for the U.S. Congress, hearing of the heads of the FAA was only the beginning of the investigation.Boeing knew since 2017 of problems, 06.05.2019 Boeing: protests and critical questions, 30.04.2019 737-Max debacle leaves a deep mark, 24.04.2019 Atlas |USA |Washington D. C.