Terrorförslaget likely to end in fiasco

"Terrorförslaget likely to end in fiasco,"

"the Proposal to criminalise the participation in a terrorist organization to be sawed by the Council."

"This government will ignore the, which could prove to be very foolish."

"minister of Justice Morgan Johansson looked clearly satisfied when he a few weeks ago presented what he described as the most important new terrorlagarna in 20 years."

"the Government wants to criminalise participation in terrorist organization, a proposal that will baxas by the parliament without major problems."

"today warns, however, the Council of state, the authority shall examine the proposals before they come into force, in order that the sections will be violating the constitution if adopted."

"the Conclusion doesn't surprise. Previous investigations to criminalize membership in the Hells Angels and similar organizations has been chucked in the bin because they have been deemed to be in conflict with the constitutional freedom of association. A consultative body has also this time muttrat until such objections."

"the Objections which the government of course have waived away. I write, of course, for the minister of justice has a need to show decisiveness."

"And as if that were not enough, he has a whole leash of angry politicians, editorialists and terroristexperter after as if in a pitched tone of voice called for new sections and then holds it not to come up with finicky objections that we actually have a constitution."

"There is no reason to deceive themselves into the jungle of the preparatory works to the constitution, the importance of the various reforms and the contents of the constitution opinionsfriheter that the Council is struggling through."

"It is enough to observe that the lawyers deem that it required a constitutional amendment to the new law will work."

"But it should also be noted that the Council has analysed the potential consequences of the amendment would be able to get."

"today there are some organisations which have objectives which are hardly compatible with democratic values. Some dream of revolution or armed struggle. Others want to back to the time before universal suffrage. Still others fantasize about Leif GW as enlightened despot."

"that's The way it works in a democracy worthy of the name. Even voices who want to eliminate the need to exist and organize itself."

"the Council fears that participation in organizations which promote such approach can be penalised. And which grundlagskydd will an organization whose members engaged in civil disobedience have? Or a trade union announces the wild strike?"

"it shall be prohibited to connect to the terrormardrömmen is is easy to say. But the law fits together in a complicated way, and the changed laws can meet other organizations and when all the dominoes have fallen clear, the consequences can be horrific."

"So what happens now? Under normal circumstances, the Moderates caved in, called the government incompetent and demanded that the proposal has been withdrawn."

"It is as it looks in the political circus. Opposition believes that it is very important to follow The recommendations, but the government yawns. Then it will be elections, a new government and the recently yawned waking up and requires that the Council shall be obeyed."

"In this particular case, however, it will not be so. For the Moderates and the others have already invested in the acclaim. And to top it all included the bill in the settlement between the government and the L and C."

"The new terrorlagen in other words, to trumfas through. And when the first case shall be examined in court may end up with the rejected."

"If this becomes the case, it is a major lagstiftningsfiasko than when the Alliance tried to do life in prison to normalstraffet for murder. "

"the Council warned, but the government was on. How it ended up? The new section proved to be so badly written that it was not possible to apply in a court of law."