Just before at 10: 30 in the day came the prosecutor Guro Glærum Kleppe to his statement facing the jury:
I ask you to answer yes to questions 1, 2, 3 and 4.
In what is the second last trial that goes before a jury, should the prosecution try to convince the jury that it is beyond doubt that the former politilederen Eirik Jensen held his protective hand over the "hasjbaronen" Gjermund Cappelen.
Spesialenheten-prosecutor Jan Egil Presthus started rettsdagen Wednesday to address matters from the 2012, and especially an episode where hasjbaronen Gjermund Cappelen was spanet on by the police together with the two Danish criminal the police were very interested in.
Jensen should then have explained that he did not believe Cappelen ran with narkotikavirksomhet, and that hasjbaronen was busy with his snusfirma:Went in his throat at Jensen. So should he turn back
Jensen has at this time made known his opinion that Cappelen not doing the crime, despite the fact that Cappelen observed with the two Danish criminal sizes. Spesialenheten believe Jensen here may have been unsure or unsafe if it was safe to continue cooperation with Cappelen, says Presthus.- I Think gives me the
In an e-mail sent 21.50 Sunday 18. march 2012 from Jensen, just after the spaningen, states the following:
"Hello. Have had a lot to do in the weekend. Heard what you said about makkeren, which was to give priority to itself. I think things have been very difficult in the past with long waiting periods and unclear contracts. We'll finish the last, so I think I'll give me. Guys want a meeting with you. I can't continue as before, when the company requires more resources." wrote Jensen.Eirik Jensen to the Newspaper: - This is the evidence that gives me hope. Plus,
At 03.16 night to Monday 19. march came the answer from Cappelen:
"Hello. Early awake. This was not something pleasant to wake up to. I understand you and feel the same way even. To meet him out in the village at 9 then I get an update also I get to go in she. We'll have a chat later today if you have the time."- is about something else
Presthus says that Jensen prior to this time had changed his position in the police, and that he no longer had the same access to information as earlier.
- Jensen may have been unsafe. Spesialenheten not see that it may be possible to read e-mail 18. march as if this is a termination of the informantforholdet. This is about something else, " says Presthus, and adds:Jensen says he considered breaking collaboration: - Can not continue as before,
- Eric Jensen want to finish something other than a cooperation with Cappelen about the information.
The voices nor with the case for the rest. Eirik Jensen had stated that cappelen in his role as an informant had ceased many years in advance.
When Presthus confronted Jensen with the e-mail in court in October, explained Jensen that he is not remembered "it with makkeren".
- But that things have been difficult, one can look at frequency of meetings and communication, which has been absent, he said.sick and tired
In the district court, in January 2017, explained to Jensen that the message probably meant that it was "a little stress" and that he had a lot to do at work.
That guys want a meeting to, interpreted Jensen as the other police would talk with Cappelen again in connection with the analysis. "Company" shall be a section in the police.
On questions about what "we'll finish the last" means, the black, Jensen:
- It may mean that it is the latest information. It can be a way to say it, and that it relates to the project without progress, and that I am sick and tired.PROCEDURES: Dagbladet commentator summarizes aktoratets procedure in the case against Eric Jensen. Prosecutors go hard out against Jensen's credibility so far in the procedures. Reporter: Hegelstad Eiendomsselskap Arvid B. Hegelstad Mogen. Video: Nicolai Delebekk / Dagbladet Show more - Tough
yesterday started the first of three days of procedures in the case that the prosecution, by Spesialenheten for police matters, went straight in the throat on Jensen's explanations and attacks on his credibility.
Much time was spent on the to view the to Jensen's changing explanations, the large amount of SMS communication between Jensen and Cappelen, gifts, and the prosecutors believe is the attempt at diversion from the Jensen in the matter.Now is the battle in the Morrison case: "It will be tough to sit and listen to
Eirik Jensen said of himself to the newspaper Dagbladet that he experienced the first day of the procedures as tough.
- I see on a day like today in exactly the same way as the previous day. We have our allotted time, and now applies it to exploit it as well as possible, " said Jensen on the way out of the courtroom yesterday.
He told me that he experiences that Spesialenheten have claims and conclusions, and that all you are presented with a minus sign.
This has been a kjempetøff travel in more than five years. You are affected by it. It is not something cheerful scenario, " he said.DEFENSE: Eirik Jensen's defender John Christian the Fire is not impressed with the aktoratets procedure. Reporter: hegelstad eiendomsselskap arvid b. hegelstad Mogen / Video: Nicolai Delebekk / Dagbladet Show more Claim: Guilty
the day continued thus, where the previous day left off, with the public prosecutor's office's procedure. It was expected that it would last well until lunch today, but just before at 10.30 went to the prosecutor Guro Glærum Kleppe through the case law to judge by the korrupsjonsbestemmelsen, before she came with his claim.
Jensen will not accept anything from Cappelen, and that it will little for the relationship is to be regarded as rough.
The deals with so gross corruption and drug offences.
the Questions the jury must decide, sounds like the following:Question 1: Is the defendant Eirik Jensen guilty of having contributed to the illegal importation of drugs?
In the foundation is shown up to 6 occasions in 2004 and 2005, up to 24 occasions between 2006 and 2009 and 18 occasions between 2010 and 2013.
to answer yes required more than 6 votes.Question 2: Does the to in question 1 above-mentioned violation of a very significant quantity?
This is an additional questions that only be answered if question 1 is answered in the affirmative:Question 3: Is defendant Eirik Jensen guilty of having received an improper benefit in the opportunity of position?
In the foundation, the Jensen in the period from 2004 to the 19. December 2013 received cash and/or contribution to the renovation and/or a mobile phone and/or a clock and/or repair of a clock.
to answer yes required more than 6 votes.Question 4: Is the corruption to be regarded as rough?
This is a supplementary questions which are only answered if question 3 is answered in the affirmative.PROCEDURE: Prosecutor Guro Kleppe ask the jury to find Eirik Jensen guilty on all points, but says that it keeps that they find it proven that he is guilty of one instrumental action. Video: NTB Scanpix Show more To turn back
Now get Jensen's defenders the opportunity to turn back.
Where Spesialenheten believe Jensen has held a protective hand over the "narkobaronen" Gjermund Cappelen, so that the latter could operate in peace for police, the mean Jensen and his defenders that he has used Cappelen as an important informant to know what is moving in criminal environments.
Jensen's defense attorney, John Christian Fire, is clear on that today they are going to go straight in the attack on Spesialenhetens presentation of the case.
- Yes, it is that belong in the procedures ... To summarize bevisførselen. We have noted that several times - also in the day - think, believe and perceive. What we mean is completely irrelevant in a criminal case, said the Fire to the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet on Tuesday.
In the course of the three days of the procedure to 72 rettsdager, over 120 witnesses and thousands of documents be accounted for.Eirik Jensen's roommate analysed the evidence: - Found something I did not get to vote. Plus