NB: Dagbladet warns of strong images further down in this matter.
A man in 20-years is sentenced to two and a half years in prison for having skinned a acquaintance man (25) in connection with a new year's party in Fredrikstad, norway. The judgment subject to appeal.
the Story began on the morning of 1. new year's day 2018, in the wake of a new year's party, when the 25-year-old and the now defendant and the man were arguing and ended up in a scuffle. 25-year-old lost consciousness in the fight began. When he woke again, he had two large wounds on his back.
while the offended person was lying unconscious on his stomach fleeced the now sentenced the man to two major hudstykker of approx. 30x20 cm and 20x10 cm from the back and flank to the offended person with a knife or other sharp tool, according to the recent verdict in the Fredrikstad district court.Men (25) skinned on the new year's party
the Man has acknowledged straffskyld, but explained in court that he can't remember exactly what happened. Both the sentenced and the offended person has explained that they fight, but none of them can remember the actual flåingen.- Very pissed off
the Tool that was used is unknown, but the superior who treated the injury, and who testified in court via the telephone, mean that it must have been a very sharp object. It may have been cut off the glass or a very sharp knife, he pointed out in court.
In connection with the trial in the Fredrikstad district court said it has now sentenced the man to the newspaper Dagbladet that although he does not remember the actual flåingen, he remembers parts of the sequence of events. This is the reason that he has acknowledged the relationship.
In the judgement of the Fredrikstad district court, the man "stated that he remembers that he stood bent over offended, that was svimeslått on the floor, and then down on his back while he had something in his hand. He is not in doubt that he acted in the manner described in the indictment, but he doesn't remember that he cut in the offended, or what kind of tool he used."
at the same time also explained the man in court that "I was very pissed off because of the fight began, and it built up so that I fleeced him."
the Defendant has even stated that he assumes that he went into a brief psychosis on handlingstidspunktet, and referred to the use of drugs and lack of sleep in the period prior to the incident.A4-SHEET: It was removed two large hudfliker from the man's back. Photo: Police Show more
It must have been the rus inside the image when the incident took place, and the man has several rusrelaterte judge from the past.hypercritical
In addition to the judgment of two and a half years in prison, the man is also ordered to pay nok 100 000 in compensation for damages to the offended person. The man has appealed the verdict.
the Verdict is too strict, " says the man's defense attorney, Harald Otterstad, which refers to the case-law in similar cases.
Just before the trial started, the man's sake.
My client has given an unreserved confession, he has relieved rettsbehandlingen by taking the attitude to the action. I don't think the court has taken into account the mitigating circumstances in this case in a good enough extent, and therefore it is natural that it is being tried in the court of appeal, " says Otterstad to the Newspaper, and adds:FOSVARER: Harald Otterstad is the man's defense. Photo: Angelica Garden / " Show more
- of Course, he shall have punishment, but this is for some. A year and a half had been a more proper level.
Otterstad says that his client was prepared for the atonement, even though he had expected a milder judgment.
He knew the claim of the prosecution, so it came as lightning from clear skies. He took it with composure. But we have gone through the case law for similar cases, and he has the thought that the sentence should end at around a year and a half.A big load
Fornærmedes lawyer Hilde Jæger says to Dagbladet that the 25-year-old is familiar with the judgment.
- He has not had time to read the ruling yet, when it was delivered today. However, he is familiar with the judgment, " says Jæger.- GREAT STRAIN: a Lawyer Hilde Jæger says it has been a great strain for her client to appear in court. Here she is pictured with the prosecutor Nils Vegard. Photo: Angelica Garden / " Show more
She had laid down the proposition that the defendant in the case should pay ménerstatning 210 423 million, but was not heard.
My client believes that the court has added gal bevisvurdering to reason, when the court cannot find it probable that he has received lasting and significant damage that provides requirements on the menerstatning.
It is automatic right of appeal in the case.
- He experiences it as a very big burden to have to go and wait on that a case will come up for trial again.- Heard a bang
A friend of the 25-year-old told in court that they were a gang at a party at the home of the offended person in Fredrikstad, norway to celebrate new year's eve, and that flåingen shall have occurred in the early morning, while the party still raged.
the Offended person and the defendant were acquaintances, but not friends. The defendant shall have come to the party to speak with the offended person, because they had a conflict.INJURED: Here is the 25-åringens back after he was skinned for a feast in the year. Photo: Police Show more
- Then I heard a bang upstairs, and then I go up the stairs, I find him halfway upright. When I see that there happened something. He is full of blood and I get a shock. I'm not used to seeing so much blood. I take him down stairs and he gets in the emergency room, told the witness.
the 25-year-old has been on sick leave for one year after the incident, and has undergone a hudtransplantasjon, where it was retrieved the skin from the thighs. This has given him two large scars on his back.
After the serious incident, he moved out of the apartment and back home to their parents.
I could not be there more. I thought of what had happened there, he said in court.Not ok
The now sentenced the man expressed that he regretted when he testified in the district court.
- I remember that I beat him in the svime, but what I did with his back afterwards was to pull the elastic too far. It is not okay at all. When I hear that I have damaged him for the rest of your life, and that he can not stay in the apartment more, I can feel it on the conscience. I don't remember how I did it or what I used.
When I hear how he has it, I feel sorry for him and those around him, the man said in court.