Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Delta Travel NBA MLB Catastrophe

reads.

SP seeks the help of the European Comrades

SP-President Christian Levrat has no easy Job. The framework agreement, the SP is cleaved as in any other question. At least if one compares the two extreme positions. The Zurich Council of States Daniel Jositsch about not says: "For me, the protection of wages question in the agreement is the largest difficulty. In the worst case, I would also write." To the contrary, but the Bernese national councillor Corrado Pardini is convinced: "In the case of the massive Wage differentials to the EU, we need flanking measures urgently. They are a Central part of the social partnership." In this case, both impact Items rich in large workers ' organisations. Pardini is a member of the Unia Executive Committee, Jositsch is President of the Commercial Association.

After the departure of Chantal Galladé – it represents in Europe a similar Position as Jositsch question and fled two weeks ago to the green liberal party is concerned at the SP to the unit. Further Disposals would be a few months before the national, and a few days before Zurich's elections disastrous. The discord in Europe is going to be made responsible for the bad poll numbers of the Enjoyed.

Common denominator

Therefore, have signed Jositsch and Pardini gotten together and, together, Levrat a paper. Therein, you agree that you want to claim the rings of the framework contract in support of the European Comrades. The SP wants to establish with the unions, a European coalition for the protection of Wages, safe working conditions, proper employment contracts and effective labour market control, it says in the paper with the three exponents as initial signatories. "We combine this support with a Wake-up call to the social democratic forces, a social and anti-nationalist turn in Europe", the Enjoyed.

Agreed, the three of them are in the claim to the Federal Council, "a framework agreement that respects the social order of Switzerland – and in particular our protection of Wages and our public Service". In addition, they are all convinced that the agreement in its current Form, has in front of the people have no Chance, because the opponent would add up to more than 50 percent of the population. 30 percent of the population, according to this logic anyway against the agreement, because the SVP – and especially Christoph Blocher – is. The Rest is due to other reasons – including, but not limited to the protection of Wages. Jositsch says: "I think, rather, that the Union citizens Directive is especially in the case of the Civil to the topic. There must be at least a clarification."

Thus, it is but with the Unity of the Comrades. In the case of the protection of wages question it needs, according to Jositsch only small improvements. The possibility of more checks, would be enough for him. Pardini makes, however, the huge wage differences within the EU. If the framework agreement is to be adopted in the present Form, then European companies can send their employees as in the past, up to 90 day in the year in Switzerland. However, you do not need to register this 8 days in advance, not more in any case, a Deposit for the buses and no longer expect them as a sanction, a ban on working in Switzerland is imminent.

in Addition, the wage would be evaluated protection in the future by the European court of justice. For Pardini is clear: "the fact That there is a block under the frame contract is not a Service any more, for me, is an unacceptable restriction of sanction of funds. Without sanctions, controls are ineffective." He would therefore, with this contract, never sign it – unless, in a supplementary Protocol mentioned in the Chapter protection of Wages would be deleted.

(editing Tamedia)

Created: 13.03.2019, 22:10 PM

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.