" />
Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Political right is the greatest environmental hazard

"”The political right is the greatest environmental hazard”" "It is, unfortunately, far too unprofitable to save the earth from going under by environmental

- 8 reads.

Political right is the greatest environmental hazard
"”The political right is the greatest environmental hazard”"

"It is, unfortunately, far too unprofitable to save the earth from going under by environmental degradation. At least unprofitable in the short term."

"That, however, it would be profitable in the slightly longer term, so that humanity survives, should probably most be able to agree on."

"We know what that accomplishes the ongoing devastation, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from fossil fuels. And we know, consequently, what can be done to save the planet. There is no kunskapsproblem. It is not even a technical problem."

"Anyway, indicates nothing that there will be."

"thus, We have to do with a political problem."

"In the excellent ambitious tv program Ekdal & Ekdal in the SVT the other day, the first serious debattprogrammet on the decades in the Swedish television, attempted to take nacksving on the political problem. Possibly they wanted to examine the brand new, pure of desperate proposal."

"the Philosopher Torbjörn Tännsjö argued that a democracy does not have enough power to implement the necessary but obvious decisions. Why you should put democracy on the break and introduce the despoti, thus, dictatorship."

"It is, but on a more large-scale, same idea as the 87 pieces of so-called influerare put forward in the Expressen, the recent. They suggested that Stefan Löfven would run over democracy in Sweden ”with a ishockeytackling”, introducing the autocracy and get on with the rescue effort, at least on Swedish territory."

"This is a completely new thought, that democracy would be the most important, even the crucial the environmental hazard."

"Ella Tännsjös counterpart in the discussion of the Ekdal & Ekdal was a liberal by the name of Mattias Svensson. He did not believe in dictatorship as miljöräddare but gave the assignment to "

"the Liberal partiledarpretendent Nyamko Sabuni formulated the idea more dogmatically powerful:"

"But who is the Market? The concept of the Market worked in the Swedish language in the 1980s. The market was prepared as an independent power, above the right or to the left, a natural phenomenon, or a new religious concept. It was when högerideologin tried to make themselves to objective science. It was not a political opinion that rich people were industrious if they could get more money through tax cuts. It was the science. As well as there was a view that poor people were lazy by money through, for example, unemployment benefits. It was also a scientific truth and a demand from the Market."

"The actual meaning of the word Market is therefore only right-wing politics, which has just now mastered the world, the system before all of our eyes leads to destruction."

"Thus was the liberal counter-proposal to Torbjörn Tännsjös idea to seek the rescue of the dictatorship useless, it meant just business as usual.nMen Tännsjös fit, or, in any case, the original, proposal encounter also in the crucial barriers."

"The capitalist dictatorship of China, piquant enough decorated with historic vänstersymboler, is one of the most powerful engines behind the ongoing destruction. Halvdemokratierna, or why not despotierna, in Russia and Brazil belong, without doubt, earth's most dangerous enemies. The new brazilian högerpresidenten Bolsonaro think it is an excellent idea to cut down the rainforest, ”the lungs of the world”."

"And so we have the Trump, which is the earth's most powerful right-wingers and at the same time, 'climate change deniers', as well as the whole entourage of högernationalister around the globe."

"It is thus the political right, whether it appear under the artist name of the Market or Donald Trump, which is the largest environmental hazard. Since, according to this ideology is not profitable to save the earth."

"And what do we do about it?"

"It is a so-called good question. But I don't think it goes a long way to bully passengers. Either we must invent one, in this case, quickly profitable, technology that converts water to clean and emission-free fuels and transform carbon dioxide into oxygen."

"Or also, in anticipation of this or other miracles, to combat the political right to the death. Perhaps, unfortunately, literally.n"

"n...it is an expression of black humour when the Stockholm district court acquitted Teliadirektörerna for bribery on the basis that they with their billions to diktatorsdottern Karimova in Uzbekistan would have bribed the wrong person. Despite the fact that the bribes demonstrably worked."

"...the police officers who shot a boy with Down syndrome to death must have done something wrong when they fired twenty-five shots, missed with twenty-two and met with three. There are numbers that simply cannot be explain. The tragedy also includes the shooters."

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.