Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Los Angeles Lakers Length Cubs New York Mets Jack Nicklaus

reads.

No to Brexit-agreement : The result of Westminster is a disaster

This is a result of the British vote in the house is a disaster. That Theresa May presented the contract with the EU on the Brexit would find in the lower house and no majority had emerged. But the Prime Minister failed so crashing, unfortunately confirmed the worst fears. The foundations of the European policy is devastating to not only the high number of negative Votes.

Would, could, May or might, after a successful vote of no confidence from Labour asked the successor to pursue a new Deal with the European Union. He or she might encounter in Brussels with the Pride and the humility of an indomitable Parliament failed leaders and say: If you want to have more, you need to make significantly more concessions. The free movement of workers to restrict, for example, the British contribution, in the style of the old claims of Maggie Thatcher, once again to reduce.

But all this would be only half the truth. The whole, brutal reality is that only a part of the naysayers wanted a different Deal. No, many of the Arranged do not want any Deal, they want an EU exit with a loud Crash. And a not so small group wants neither a Deal, nor even an exit – no, the want to stay in the European Union. They represent the Remainer, would you love to have a new Referendum, which they hope to be after all the evidence in front of a pro-European output.

This Britain, this fractious so totally in, in differences dogged the political class, the European Union may submit to any kind of compromise. At the Moment, so it is only useful, on this Wednesday evening's planned vote of no-confidence, and your output to be seen. May is overthrown, the laboratory chief Jeremy Corbyn, a majority, you have to see which political direction he question can be found in the EU-a majority. The confidence vote is successful, keep the observer in London, but at the Moment this is unlikely. Because the turmoil in the Brexit - and Remain-the question is Yes across the parties.

And new elections? You would have to be preceded by an election campaign, in which once again the same question as in the early summer of 2016 to play a Central role would be: it Is for the UK an advantage to stay in the European Union, or to benefit all on the island more of a stand-alone? Would be the decision today is different than at 23. June 2016? Opinion polls give no clear information, the majorities, pro or contra, are fragile. The only difference could be, but this is also just maybe, that this time, not so much lied about the loads, of which the EU-independent of the UK could get rid. These incredible stories there were, of course, especially with the Weariness was stoked at the unloved "Over-government" in Brussels.

there is A small Chance

And perhaps, but even that is only a small Chance, it could win the Europe of 27 in the time of the British election campaign clarity on where it wants to itself. The debate is raging, not only in the States with strong populist movements. The discourse, if the Supra can be National really an Option, is already in progress. Also Think about whether more national sovereignty would really be so detrimental to the efficiency of the community. If you do not defined his goals just a bit more realistic, and across the channel is the message: Actually, we have benefited in the last decades of the EU.

More about

Brexit vote in the news blog Theresa May vote loses a vote of no confidence on Wednesday

Kai Portmann John Laub Meier Ruth Ciesinger

If such a message gets to the voters in the UK, is because you have to be self-honest, very questionable. Only one thing is certain: If the EU believes it is now, the British say, what to do, it is the opposite of reach.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.