Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Must Mr. sperisen was indicted in 15 years in prison

Mr. sperisen was indicted in The 15-year-old imprisonment for Erwin, the former police chief in Guatemala, is not appealable. The Federal court has confirmed th

- 45 reads.

Must Mr. sperisen was indicted in 15 years in prison

Mr. sperisen was indicted in The 15-year-old imprisonment for Erwin, the former police chief in Guatemala, is not appealable. The Federal court has confirmed the judgment of the Geneva justice. Sperisens lawyers have announced the corridor in front of the European court of human rights.

In April 2018, had been sentenced Mr. sperisen was indicted in the Geneva justice in the second start-up to 15 years in prison because of Complicity to murder, in seven cases. It was an Operation in September 2006 in Guatemala, with the control of a prison recovered should be. Seven prisoners died. That Mr. sperisen was indicted in has now been as the accomplice of a in Austria, the accused Person is convicted, was not traceable and the case law of the European court is contrary to court for human rights in Strasbourg, diametrically, informed the lawyers of Mr. sperisen was indicted in on Thursday.

The final ruling from Lausanne to contradict in addition to a first judgment of the Federal court. This have found, Mr. sperisen was indicted in a fair process had been denied and his conviction was unsustainable. In a first handling Mr. sperisen was indicted in 2015 had been sentenced to a life imprisonment, whereas he had in part connected with success.

The Swiss justice authorities have stepped according to a statement, the lawyers most elementary requirements of a fair process leadership, with the feet, particularly the right to an impartial court. There is nothing Mr. sperisen was indicted in was, therefore, left as the aisle all the way to Strasbourg.

No contradiction to the previous decision

not to be objectionable, The Federal court wrote in his message to the judgment, the second verdict of the Geneva cantonal court by April 2018 due to complicity to seven murders. The Supreme court justices see no contradiction to your own rejection decision for the first judgment of the Geneva justice in 2015. The second judgment against Mr. sperisen was indicted in had been justified by the Canton court, is sufficient. In particular, the Geneva cantonal court was not obliged to pay, additional witnesses to listen to. These objections of Mr. sperisen was indicted in I checked the Federal court as early as 2017. Also, the claim Sperisens to a fair trial had not been violated. Similarly, the louse did not let apply men judge other objections of the defendants to the legal qualification of the acts as murder.

Mr. sperisen was indicted in had turned in mid-November with a letter to the United Federal Assembly and the Federal court decides before the end of the year, on his appeal against the judgment of the Geneva justice of 2018. The time that the Federal court need for the examination of his dossier, was "unacceptably long".

Because the beginning of 2020, the criminal Department of the court will set, is to be feared that the new judge would have to resume the examination of his case from the front, so Mr. sperisen was indicted in in its Letter. With the publication of the decision by the Federal court, this request is done well enough. The former Director General of the national police of Guatemala, fled the scene in 2007, in Switzerland, and lived for five years unmolested in Geneva. There, he was arrested in August 2012 and sass then five years in custody. In the fall of 2017, he was released with an electronic ankle cuff in house arrest. (Judgment 6B_865/2018 from 14. November) (sda/red)

Created: 28.11.2019, 16:03 PM

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.