Mueller Report: evidence that Trump wanted to impede justice

It would have to be the large discharge of the Donald Trump . Not had it announced to US attorney General William Barr? No collusion, no obstruction – no conspiracy, no obstruction of Justice? Now the long-awaited report from special investigator Robert Mueller. It should provide clarity about how far the Russian Attempts to influence the US presidential election. Clarity on whether there was collusion with trump's re-election campaign. And clarity about whether Trump needed his Power as US President to hinder the elucidation of these processes by the judiciary. But a discharge, which was on Maundy Thursday is 448 pages long report.

This has a lot to do with how the American Public has received from the contents of the document knowledge. Ahead of a four-page summary of Barr's spring, this left the Congress before a month is gone of its publication. You fell, now hold on, for Trump quite nicely. It remains though, that Mueller has found for illegal collusion of the Trump campaign with Russia has no evidence – and no more, even if the Democrats are talking now of almost, always the most important question. However, the report of the special investigator in the question of obstruction of Justice in a significantly more critical of the image, as did Barr.

report tweet

Had limited the Minister of justice in his summary Mainly on the statement that Mueller was, in this respect, to arrive at any conclusion, the special investigator in his report early on the following, for Trump unflattering statement: "we Would have after a careful investigation of the facts, the certainty that the President clearly has not committed obstruction of Justice, we would cling to it accordingly. On the basis of the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are not in a position to make such a judgment." Instead, Mueller presents a detailed account of all of those Manifestations and actions of Trumps, at a Minimum, very questionable. Many of them have already been publicized in the past two years (the report is peppered with Tweets and public statements of the President), on the other, you knew little to nothing.

These include, for example, the Attempts of Trumps, the former chief lawyers of the White house, Donald McGahn, to bring to a deposition of the special investigator. In June 2017, after it became known that Trump was moved because of the question of judicial disability even in the focus of the investigators, urged the President McGahn in multiple Calls to be in this matter to the Ministry of justice is active. "Mueller must go", said Trump, therefore, to McGahn, "call me if you have done it." The lawyer did nothing. Similar pressure also try other staff and Confidante of the President were exposed, Barr's predecessor as Minister of justice, Jeff Sessions, was delivered to the Annoyance Trumps the supervision of Mueller's investigation of conflict of interest.

The investigation identified a number of actions Trumps, "which could serve as an undue influence on the criminal investigation to exercise," says Mueller. This is also the way that counts for the special investigator, as Trump tries could have witnesses such as his former campaign Manager Paul Manafort, with the prospect of a pardon of a cooperation with the judicial hold. "The efforts of the President to influence the investigation, were mostly not successful, but that has mainly to do with the people around the President refused to carry out his orders, or his Wishes," writes Mueller – an explosive set that underlines how much Trump felt that the investigation followed. "Oh my God, this is terrible," he said, according to the report, his advisors, when he learned of the establishment of the special investigator. "This is the end of my presidency."

Was Trump's "sinister intention"?

Despite this incriminating evidence, Mueller makes no statement as to whether, in his eyes a Crime Trumps. At this point, the report reveals a further contradiction to the representation of Barr's: This had claimed in his summary that there could be no obstruction of Justice, if there was no illegal collusion with Russia. Mueller does not share this view, as he goes in the report. He justified the waiver of a conclusion regarding the obstruction of Justice, rather, with the various legal and factual hurdles that must be met in order to be able to such evidence. A Central role is played by the question of whether Trump was going on in his Expressions and actions "reprehensible intent". This, in itself would become difficult, because Trump refused a direct interview by Mueller comply.

What relates to the Russian interference in the presidential election campaign draws Mueller the clear conclusion that there was a complicity with Russia there is no sufficient evidence. At the same time it is clear from the report that trump's Team was about the plans of the platform Wikileaks in the picture, to publish stolen E-Mails from the Democrats – and this is also in the anticipation of welcomed that it would hurt trump's opponent, Hillary Clinton. Illegal collusion was the special investigator, but no evidence. Also in the media for months-discussed Meeting of Trumps son Donald Trump junior, and son-in-law Jared Kushner with a Russian lawyer, had no criminal consequences. However, Mueller also mentioned that some of the witnesses were deleted in the course of the investigation evidence, what might have "thrown a new light" on certain events.

Impeachment, Yes or no?

what now? Trump and his supporters speak as expected, once again, that the President was fully rehabilitated. Give the Democrats after the publication of Mueller's report to understand as well as expected, you don't want to give still not satisfied. Although the Barr shared version of the report is blacked out nearly as strong as many had feared, but the Opposition is of the essence however, throughout the report, as well as to inspect documents that served the special investigator as a basis. Soon, the Democrats should subpoena also Mueller personally, to the Congress on its investigation to testify. Some opposition representatives also speak again about an Impeachment. But impeachment is not likely to give it on the basis of this report. "This is not worth the effort," said Steny Hoyer, the head of the Democrats in the house of representatives, told CNN.

Almost bigger than the anger Trump the Trouble about the Minister of justice seems to be in the Opposition at present. And actually, the way it raises, such as Barr, with Mueller's report avoided, questions. Since the one-page summary, which set the tone for the Interpretation of the report. As the Episode was, as Barr in Congress was the accusation in the room that Trumps election campaign is being spied on. Because of the fact that trump's lawyers Mueller's received the report in advance. And finally, irritated Barr with his press conference, he presented again his interpretation of the investigations, without the journalists had received the report in advance to the face. He was not a Minister of justice who is committed to the production of transparency, but as one who sees himself as the personal bodyguard of the President, the unpopular facts trying to cover up. Whether he has helped Trump is another question.

(Tages-Anzeiger)

Created: 19.04.2019, 08:30 PM