the Helsinki court of appeal started on Wednesday, the main hearing of the violent crime charges, which rose in July 28. happened lönnrot's street hit-and-run as a result. A key issue is whether the district court correctly, when I was waiting for a psychiatric evaluation to be completed before taking a position on the charges. In many other cases, the right to express its views, for example, the homicide intentional interim judgment, although the state of mind research is still in progress.
In 1965, born of the doomed were brought to the court of appeal Niuvanniemi psychiatric hospital. The district court considered her mental status examination on the basis of "non compos mentis". Man convicted of aggravated manslaughter and aggravated the injury negligence, but the charges of murder and manslaughter companies fell.
the district attorney Eija Velitski justification to choose their court of appeal. He repeated the deed in the description that the man was driving in violation of traffic rules already in alexander strasse and caused several incidents. According to the prosecution, the man had himself told me that he had understood, that the wrong driving during his.
the Man was going to the bar give the street. On the way he caused the five-year old woman's death and injuries to five other people. Pedestrians were crossing the crosswalk on a green light at lincoln street.the Victim fell off the car
velitski, according to the two pedestrians had left after a collision on the hood, when you kill the drive to continue their journey.
He is in a moment of silenced speed, when the second victim fell from the car to the right side and the second ran in front of the car. The victim fell to the ground he has continued immediately after driving, when the victim left to drag themselves to catch the car etumaskissa, Velitski said.
the District court to justify a psychiatric examination, citing that the man was mentally so weak, I couldn't evaluate his actions dangerous. The prosecutor did not challenge a psych evaluation, but the reason for the read crime, though.
the owner of the side assisted the deputy judge Olli south hill presented to the court of appeal, where the trial is all about. The court had to determine again, what kind of intentionality degrees touchdown pass works followed: according to the complaint, five twenty-something man came to understand, that crashed the likely consequence was death.
Separately, the lawyer raised the issue of how the district court had taken a psychiatric evaluation intent evaluation instrument.
– the District court has unexpectedly given a so big importance of the state of mind of opinion. There is rarely make such simplistic conclusions, on the south hill said.
the Case continued to image after.One died and four were injured in the summer of 2017 what happened in the accident. Give spring bay a judgment also to the defense
the Condemned man sat in court relatively calm. His legal counsel Tero Ala-Mieto told me, that the defense objects to choose from. Justification, according to the district court was necessary to assess the issue until after the psych exam.
I think that there was anything wrong or strange. District court was a state of mind, after the opinion of much more information about what my client had meant, understood or detected, In a Mild assessment.
the Defense says the red jaguar's speed is not worse in case of danger very great, while the situation speed was high. The parties have a different view of how men see and experience while driving, especially in its final stage. The prosecutor considered worthy of attention, for example, that the death of the female victim was dragged from the car with up to 260 meters.
– the defendant must have certainty that the victim had a car of structure. Car maneuverability impaired, it was difficult to drive, Velitski justification.
Written evidence when dealing with the prosecutor showed pictures of a man driving route. The bus had left tens of meters long bloody old.
the Defense perspective has contributed to this state of mind statement. The session began behind closed doors, and reasons remain a secret. Story reading was previously revealed that the man suffered at times weakening of the sense of reality."push the feeling"
Sentenced to open my own mouth in the court of appeal, when the defence went through a case presentation. He wanted to fix the prosecutor's words the work begins with a step.
the Man went to the end of the afternoon the senate square location to the food to the restaurant and ordered food and a bottle of red wine. According to the prosecution, the waiter took the drink away, but the man told me he gave it to himself and he got drinks for the unauthorised part of the money back.
the Accused told me how unsteady mental health begins to mix his head. Defense says it was "the impending panic attack".
I was supposed to be a restaurant originally two hours, the man explained.
there Was a feeling that all the tables look all the time. There was a sultry feel.
Prosecutors claim the 53-year-old man sentence for murder and five for attempted murder. Thing owners have contributed to the united appeal and require the defendant costs.