David Eberhard called a psychiatrist whose entry in the public debate arouses reactions, as it is usually hot when someone has many enemies. And if his book, ”The great könsexperimentet” you can think what you want – provided that you are not talboksinläsare, want to say. For the point of a talking book is to make available the book for the visually impaired. Not more, not less.
It is the same thing as with the språköversättning. It is not an exact science, rather an attempt to detail for the detail to reproduce exactly the right shades. It is difficult. And even more is made of it by the temptation to change, to improve. But never that you get to do it, how much it itches in one, for it is to set oneself in the way of the work, and for the mission.
”The big könsexperimentet” and added their own comments in talboken. the It was David Eberhards presentation of postmodernism: ”I think the author has misinterpreted both grew quite dramatically. That the truths is, there are hardly any postmodernist who claims. Rather that truths exist but are interchangeable. Furthermore, it is questionable to call it a movement. It is an umbrella term for the various isms, for example, the theory with several.”
this kind of high-handed besserwissrar found in all political camps.
It is so stupid. Those responsible at the Agency for accessible media, MTM, realizes thankfully the problem and have handled everything right – apart from releasing through this förnumstiga drivel to begin with then. They stress that ”inläsarens comment” is an add-on which may only be used, for example, syntolka images or correct an obvious typo. They have stopped the existing loading and ordered a new one, by another forklift. They shall review their procedures, and have contacted the author and apologized.
still not. In the comments to a Facebooktråd he writes: ”Eberhard has not track of postmodernism. Should you criticize a phenomenon, one should also be able to know what it stands for.” And many of those who dislike David Ebenhard and his ideas, applaud the ”correction”. Fun done!, do they think! Well done! Brave! A real hero! Absolutely right!
if you Find it so you do not understand what this is about: this loader sets itself above not only the author and the work, but also of the listeners. It is not the moral courage to change the contents of a book, it is sabotage. And this sort of high-handed besserwissrar found in all political camps. Next time it could very well affect a work as David Eberhards detractors themselves like.