/>

Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Investigations against ZPS, a group of artists : A strange and hard-working attorney

the satirist, the Satire, journalists, journalism and performance artists that make the art of action, can get into conflicts with the law. Jan böhmermann is an example, was prosecuted for insulting the Turkish state heads of criminal. The Blogger of "network policy" has been accused of another, which is treason, because they had provided sensitive intelligence international into the net.

Both procedures are set. Open of the "center for political beauty", for more than a year. As a sort of civil protection of the Constitution, the artists had announced that the right of national Thuringian AfD Chairman in his private house monitor. As only now was known, initiated the public Prosecutor's office Gera then investigation. The suspected formation of a criminal organisation, Paragraph 129 of the penal code, for the purpose of "violation of personal Living space by means of image recordings", Section 201a.

Apparent satirical provocation

the satirist, journalist, and performance artist have to go in there. You have no special, you have only basic rights. The rich. At the end they emerge usually emerge from such disputes. Nevertheless, the investigation may have been entitled. Everything is not always equal to a scandal.

That may be true also for the case of the "centre". Nevertheless, it seems strangely hard-working, a recognizable satirical provocation was immediately taken to the occasion, a file create. And then, due to Clause 129. The Federal court has on several occasions expressed that this offence will be considered only if committed or planned crime of "criminal Association" means a significant risk to public safety. The idea of proportionality is; not least because the suspect in the surveillance Arsenal of the criminal procedure code can be enabled to: Listen, observe, and the like.

Strange diligently the investigating Prosecutor, who is also the spokesman of the authority in Gera. He explained the own decision, without making it clear that it was their own decision. Weird, lazy, on the other hand, that he has taken in the matter even a little. The file is probably not in the whole time much thicker. How? So far, no indication has become known, that the provocative action was anything other than a provocative action and not a criminal Offence.

More about

Criminal Association? Prosecutor's office against "the centre for political beauty"

Matthias Meisner

What's going on? A Minister of justice should not interfere. But he can certainly ask. Especially when, as here, at an early stage has not been informed that there is such a sensitive procedure. Because diligent enough to report the process to the above was the state's attorney from Gera.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.